Sal1950
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Posts
- 769
- Likes
- 209
Spec wise that may well be true but I am one of those contrary fellows who doesn't believe everything he reads or is told But that's just me.
I have neither the time nor the inclincation to get into that level of detail and ensuing expense.
And sometimes I DO wonder - who wrote the book of .... no,no that's not it.
I wonder what this FULL Potential of the HD650 sounds like. Is it different that what I am hearing? And if so in what audible ways? What am I missing?
That question could spawn and entire thread that may last.... well, forever perhaps
They sound just fine with the Aune and better to my ears at least, with RX MK3+, but everyone's ears and the connection to the brain is different and so different ears hear different things.
I think this discussion might be something like arguing about how many fairies can dance on the head of the pin
I always lose count and get it wrong!
Only one guys opinion which you can take with a grain of salt or not.
The real truth is that amplifier technology is a VERY mature tech and has been for many years. The audible differences between most any modern SS amps designed for accurate sound reproduction is going to be extremely subtle. Then there are tons of amps on the market that are designed to be tone and detail controls, find one that fits the euphonic sound that pleases you and run with it. Some folks belong to the amp of the month club, others have tube amps and swap tubes constantly to alter the sound. Same can be done with the equalizer controls included in many playback software, hardware, etc.
It's up to you, do you want an accurate (High Fidelity) system or something more pleasing to your personal taste. Either path is justifiable and a personal choice.