Sennheiser HD650 & Massdrop HD6XX Impressions Thread
Jun 2, 2015 at 8:39 PM Post #25,772 of 46,514
  Probably one of the most amazing groups from the 70's was Led Zeppelin.  It's taken how many iterations of remasters and remakes to improve the sound?  Each or these remasters attempt to improve on the previous and to a degree they are getting better (not to mention the fellas are also getting richer) but I still wouldn't consider the ultimate best remaster to date a truly great recording. 

 
No, that's true but go & listen to Boz Scaggs (Silk Degrees), Al Stewart (Year of the Cat) or John Martyn (Solid Air) and you'll hear a rich soundstage full of detail and with nothing emphasized.
 
Jun 2, 2015 at 9:15 PM Post #25,773 of 46,514
Cat Stevens - Tea for the Tillerman on SACD, or even better, the 24/96 Doc Roberts vinyl rip. Air, emotion, timbre, detail. Wow.
 
Jun 2, 2015 at 9:19 PM Post #25,774 of 46,514
   
No, that's true but go & listen to Boz Scaggs (Silk Degrees), Al Stewart (Year of the Cat) or John Martyn (Solid Air) and you'll hear a rich soundstage full of detail and with nothing emphasized.


Read your post and broke out the Crack and HD650s. Listening to Boz Scaggs Silk Degrees. I have a BIG smile on my face. Next, Greatest Hits Live.
 
Jun 2, 2015 at 9:23 PM Post #25,775 of 46,514
 
  Probably one of the most amazing groups from the 70's was Led Zeppelin.  It's taken how many iterations of remasters and remakes to improve the sound?  Each or these remasters attempt to improve on the previous and to a degree they are getting better (not to mention the fellas are also getting richer) but I still wouldn't consider the ultimate best remaster to date a truly great recording. 

 
No, that's true but go & listen to Boz Scaggs (Silk Degrees), Al Stewart (Year of the Cat) or John Martyn (Solid Air) and you'll hear a rich soundstage full of detail and with nothing emphasized.


May I also suggest Steely Dan.  The production of their albums is outstanding.  The bulk of their recording was done in the 70s.
 
Jun 2, 2015 at 9:26 PM Post #25,776 of 46,514
 
  Like I said, if the music you listen too is not well recorded...then no dac or amp will help that....no mod will help that....crap in = crap out.
 
Your genres of music must just not be recorded to well.....like 70's rock music was recorded bad.
 
There is a lot of good music that is well recorded today, though....make no mistake about that....lots and lots of it  
smile.gif


I think a lot of the 70's rock was better recorded than some of the current pop stuff.  Bruno Mars and Beyoncé are two that come to mind as really bad.


Is Bruno Mars a dark chocolate Mars Bar ?
 
Jun 2, 2015 at 9:49 PM Post #25,777 of 46,514
Jun 2, 2015 at 11:45 PM Post #25,778 of 46,514
  oh.....I dont listen to that , so I would not know......lol
 
I mean, i have heard of them, it is not what I listen to.
 
Not all 70's rock was bad, but an awful lot was.
 
It's is strange though....I have been listening to a lot of old blues lately......so much very old stuff that was extremley well recorded.


Some people like pop idols, airbrushed averages of that decades beatific ideals.
 
Other people prefer Janis Joplin or Heart in all of their unpolished, realistic, soulful fury.
 
 
I'll give you an example, Dave Brubeck's Take Five, still one of the best jazz recordings in my collection. It's not particularly clean, or well recorded, or reference material. It's kind of dirty, dingy, compared to todays recording clarity, etc. But it's bursting with character and I love it.
 
The Moody Blues - Days of Future Past. One of the most crappified recordings of the 60's. Heavy dynamic compression, wall of sound trying to saturate and sound good on an AM radio, lots of tape hiss, fake instruments like the mellotron. Pretentious poetry and lyrics. And I don't give a damn because I fricking love it. I wore my LP out when I was a teenager (not that old, it was old even at that time) and Nights in white satin and Tuesday afternoon are still the songs of my childhood even though they were 25 years after they came out.
 
Nobody listens to the Beatles because OMG they were recorded so well. It's because the flaws are just as lovable as the rest of the song.
 
Modern music uses more and more dynamic compression to try and cram more and more signal into a limited amount of dynamic headroom, and the effect is if you have a VU meter, it goes to 0 and stays there until the song is over. There is no air in the music anymore. At least pop music. Lets not forget as much as everyone worships The Beatles, and Rolling Stones with their wizard Brian Jones, they were pop music of their time. Pop music can be art like Radiohead. Sadly we only have 1 Radiohead, and a metric ton of flavor of the week pin up models trying to sell records.
 
 
 
Pay homage to the king!
 
 
 
Also, because **** it why not
 
 
 
Jun 3, 2015 at 1:19 AM Post #25,779 of 46,514
No, that's true but go & listen to Boz Scaggs (Silk Degrees), Al Stewart (Year of the Cat) or John Martyn (Solid Air) and you'll hear a rich soundstage full of detail and with nothing emphasized.


Thumbs up on your mention of John Martyn. Another great one we lost in recent years. His interplay with Danny Thompson was always incredible.
 
Jun 3, 2015 at 1:19 AM Post #25,780 of 46,514
No, that's true but go & listen to Boz Scaggs (Silk Degrees), Al Stewart (Year of the Cat) or John Martyn (Solid Air) and you'll hear a rich soundstage full of detail and with nothing emphasized.


Thumbs up on your mention of John Martyn. Another great one we lost in recent years. His interplay with Danny Thompson was always incredible.
 
Jun 3, 2015 at 1:25 AM Post #25,781 of 46,514
Sorry for the double post folks.
 
Jun 3, 2015 at 4:01 AM Post #25,783 of 46,514
 
May I also suggest Steely Dan.  The production of their albums is outstanding.  The bulk of their recording was done in the 70s.


As a life-long fan, I was pleasantly surprised by how good the mastering is on their latest compilation. This edition was remastered by Joe Palmaccio, as opposed to Roger Nichols, and the sound is stunning. Too bad Joe P. didn't remaster the entire catalog, but at least the compilation is most of my personal favorite tracks. This is one of my "auditioning new gear" albums.
 

 
Jun 3, 2015 at 4:59 AM Post #25,784 of 46,514
 
 
I think a lot of the 70's rock was better recorded than some of the current pop stuff.  Bruno Mars and Beyoncé are two that come to mind as really bad.

Probably one of the most amazing groups from the 70's was Led Zeppelin.  It's taken how many iterations of remasters and remakes to improve the sound?  Each or these remasters attempt to improve on the previous and to a degree they are getting better (not to mention the fellas are also getting richer) but I still wouldn't consider the ultimate best remaster to date a truly great recording. 

Yeah, no truer words have ever been spoken and I agree, the latest remasters are as good as it gets to date .
 
The music made by these guys is truly some of the best ever.
 
 
 
  Probably one of the most amazing groups from the 70's was Led Zeppelin.  It's taken how many iterations of remasters and remakes to improve the sound?  Each or these remasters attempt to improve on the previous and to a degree they are getting better (not to mention the fellas are also getting richer) but I still wouldn't consider the ultimate best remaster to date a truly great recording. 

 
No, that's true but go & listen to Boz Scaggs (Silk Degrees), Al Stewart (Year of the Cat) or John Martyn (Solid Air) and you'll hear a rich soundstage full of detail and with nothing emphasized.


May I also suggest Steely Dan.  The production of their albums is outstanding.  The bulk of their recording was done in the 70s.

Yes, Steely Dan albums are recorded very well.
 
Jun 3, 2015 at 5:25 AM Post #25,785 of 46,514
 
Some people like pop idols, airbrushed averages of that decades beatific ideals.
 
Other people prefer Janis Joplin or Heart in all of their unpolished, realistic, soulful fury.
 
 
 
Also, because **** it why not
 
 


 
Funny you should mention Heart. Bad Animals is without a doubt the very worst recording I've ever heard. Really, it's that bad. People should buy it just as a reference of how badly a recording can be screwed up.
 
As for Russian Circles, what can I say? I have everything by them but the track you've highlighted here is probably my own favourite too. Aural fireworks. I have a copy of it in the car so that I can impress the ladies (not really, I'm 50). I have twin Alpine subs in the boot (trunk) driven with over 800W and the slam in this tune is truly jaw-dropping!
Thumbs up on your mention of John Martyn. Another great one we lost in recent years. His interplay with Danny Thompson was always incredible.

 
Yes, Solid Air is in my all-time top 5 recordings & you're right, the musicianship is top of the class. A sad loss.
 
As a life-long fan, I was pleasantly surprised by how good the mastering is on their latest compilation. This edition was remastered by Joe Palmaccio, as opposed to Roger Nichols, and the sound is stunning. Too bad Joe P. didn't remaster the entire catalog, but at least the compilation is most of my personal favorite tracks. This is one of my "auditioning new gear" albums.
 

 
This is now on my list. Thanks.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top