I know, I was just teasing.
For me, I haven't notice changing in sound signature with burn in. I either like them or not, or I slowely adjust to them. Not saying burn in doesn't exist, I often wonder how much of a change we are talking here. I can see how pads breaking in can affect the sound signature. Maybe I don't have hearing as good as others.
Ah I see. I haven't really come across a fundamental change in sound signature either unless the pads are horribly worn or if the headphone is picky about a seal and new stiff pads need breaking in. The K240 kept it's sound signature but became ragged in the treble, it's been a long time since I owned them though. Usually it's a matter of a headphone getting better control of it's sound so to speak in my experience. Who knows when it comes to hearing. Different people have different strengths and weaknesses in terms of hearing capability. The frequency range people can hear obviously differs as well as tonal hearing, there is many other differences in hearing among people as well. This is likely a huge reason people hear things differently. There are so many factors to take into consideration. Some people are also very sensitive to various problems with the sound such as grain, emphasis's in certain regions, peaky treble, etc. I have very sensitive ears personally, most headphones outside the HD 600/650 and DT 150 bother me fairly often in terms of aural fatigue. Some headphones are particularly abusive to my ears, the Sony MDR-MA900 for example is one of the most fatiguing headphones I have ever used, due the excessive amount of grain in it's sound. A lot of people say it's laid-back and warm, but I found it brash, abrasive, and straight up fatiguing regardless of the system and even at low volumes. I only liked it at first because I was coming from the K240 MKII which was even more fatiguing to my ears