You seem to have taken my input personally. It wasn't meant to read that way. I have absolutely no doubt that the Crack helps make the 650's sound wonderful. It's on my list. However, to state that a DAC is somehow surplus to requirements is clearly nonsense. Unless we're talking analogue here there has to be a DAC right at the head of the chain, that's a given. The DAC supplies all the information that the Crack then amplifies in order to drive the headphones. Given that you're spending so much money on headphones and amplifier does it surely makes sense to ensure the source (DAC) is as good as you can afford?
You've heard of the 'garbage in, garbage out' theory I presume? The saying originates in the world of computers but we oldies rather wittily applied it to the analogue chain back in the early 80's. The most important part of the system was the turntable, then the amp & then the speakers or headphones. The best transducers in the world can't put back what isn't there to start with, can they? Trust me, Linn wouldn't be where they are now if it hadn't been for them standing the hi-fi industry on it's head with their LP12. I used to sell them.
What is also true though is that the overall character of the sound is affected more by the speakers or headphones. The Crack is just a valve amplifier like all the rest but it's designed in such a way that it's sonic characteristics just happen to work very well when paired with the HD 650 (and others). Whether this was by design or a fluke I have no way of knowing. Like I say, it's on my list. I'll find out one day. Trust me, add a better DAC and the sound will only improve. DAC's do sound different, although in my (admittedly limited) experience not by much.
And just for the record, just because I don't own a component doesn't mean I can't comment on it's quality. I can read and everything I have read about the Crack is good.