fidgeraldo
Headphoneus Supremus
Not bad at all...hmm, I can imagine this pulled out loud on speakers...unfortunately...can't now, perhaps some day in the future...Friday night dinner music.
Not bad at all...hmm, I can imagine this pulled out loud on speakers...unfortunately...can't now, perhaps some day in the future...Friday night dinner music.
I'm not smart enough to really speak about it detail, but I think they also changed the driver and baffle material/design to add more bass presence and cut some of the upper mids. I want to say they made the driver slightly more technical, with lower THD esp in the bass because it seems cleaner.I will phrase this as a statement, but, in fact it is a question. Is this maybe true ?
The biggest difference between the HD660S and the HD660S2 is that Sennheiser abandoned the idea of trying to make the HD660 be headphones for smartphones. That is to say, moving down from 300 ohms to 150 ohms, as they did with the S. As they are "open back" headphones, the idea that people will be wearing them outside of the home was always a bit doubtful. Going back to 300 ohms with the S2 allowed Sennheiser to go back to making great HD660 headphones again, in terms of design and manufacturing.
Is that true, maybe ?
Yes, something like that. And then those changes meant that they needed more electricity, more "ohms", to push the heavier materials (?). That's essentially what I am wondering about.but I think they also changed the driver and baffle material/design to add more bass presence... they made the driver slightly more technical, with lower THD esp in the bass because it seems cleaner.
From the horses mouth.The biggest difference between the HD660S and the HD660S2 is that Sennheiser abandoned the idea of trying to make the HD660 be headphones for smartphones.
So basically an improved driver performance all round.I don't know, what does that mean to you? If you look at the color or size, that's the same.
The acoustic difference between HD 660S and HD 660S2 have mostly been achieved by significant changes to the transducer, which has a markedly different diaphragm, voice coil and magnet chassis, which are the primary components of the motor. I already elaborated on the diaphragm, the voice coil is also new and has an impedance closer to 350 Ohms, and the magnet chassis had to be revised to accommodate the larger excursion. So if your definition of "driver" is different acoustically relevant elements, then this a new driver. From a manufacturing standpoint, it's much harder to build and costs us up to 3 times as much as the original SYS40. To me, those differences make it a new transducer.
With the HD 660S2 we have optimized all parameters for what we think is ideal music playback, ie. much better detail retrieval and more impactful bass.
Funny how that works....I can never see me going back to another HD650 or 660S....the HD600 is a classic so doesn't count, so a maybe.Well, it seems that I've come full circle with the s2.
Yep...perforated sheep skin...changed the sound slightly, but not enough to not like them. : )......Anyone here use pads?
Did you consider any other amps? Maybe even a tube amp at a similar price point? I plan to get a pair and am researching what to pair them with.I am pairing my 660s2 with the newer JDS Element 3 Mk2, they seem to pair very well. You also get a nice deep bass with this pairing without any EQ. In the case you do need to add some bass or treble the Element does allows you to EQ the bass and treble in the controls
I really like the JDS Element and how they pair with my headphones, maybe in the future, when I have money ill try a tube amp.Did you consider any other amps? Maybe even a tube amp at a similar price point? I plan to get a pair and am researching what to pair them with.