- Joined
- Jan 27, 2006
- Posts
- 4,156
- Likes
- 66
Quote:
But don't you see how silly this is? ... I mean you can't really know how bad the beats are if your bringing a headphone like the 650 into the equation. The Beats are $300 in the store and stores pay anywhere between 30-50% per item, so even at 50% were now looking at $150, Dr. Dre takes a large chunk per headphone, marketing costs millions... you are likely looking at a headphone that without all the above would cost between $30-$50 on Amazon.
So perhaps a better comparison would be the $50 Sony XB-500, give those a listen sound-by-side and see which you prefer.
Originally Posted by thatt1guy /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm not so new that i think that the beats vs the 650s are a real comparison i just wanted to know the extent. To what extent are the 650s better, to what extent are the beats worse. With all this senn 650 favoring however, i think that i have found my answer that the 650s and beats are worlds apart. Thank you for your inputs |
But don't you see how silly this is? ... I mean you can't really know how bad the beats are if your bringing a headphone like the 650 into the equation. The Beats are $300 in the store and stores pay anywhere between 30-50% per item, so even at 50% were now looking at $150, Dr. Dre takes a large chunk per headphone, marketing costs millions... you are likely looking at a headphone that without all the above would cost between $30-$50 on Amazon.
So perhaps a better comparison would be the $50 Sony XB-500, give those a listen sound-by-side and see which you prefer.