Rip N' Burn
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Posts
- 1,774
- Likes
- 32
Quote:
I own the W3 and the IE8. The W3 cannot compare in terms of soundstage and bass. Bass extends very deep with the IE8, and the soundstage is comparable to big cans. The W3's perform better with imaging. Ever since I got IE8's, I barely listen to the W3's. In the near future, I'm probably going to sell them, or trade for a back up pair of IE8's. This is just my preference. There are many people who prefer the W3's over the IE8's. The IE7's have a smaller soundstage and less bass as compared to the IE8. If your not a basshead, the IE7 will be a better choice. Hope this helps.
Originally Posted by skidu /img/forum/go_quote.gif Finally to anyone who owns the W3 & IE8 - i've read the IE8 has very deep bass and great sound staging but how does the W3 compare? In the UK the W3 work about about £100 more and ideally for that price i would rather get a pair of HD650's - so unless they are substantially better the IE8 looks like the best option atm. Oh and just to confuse matters futher, how does the IE7 stack up to the IE8 in bass/soundstage (i'm not really too bothered about the midrange) |
I own the W3 and the IE8. The W3 cannot compare in terms of soundstage and bass. Bass extends very deep with the IE8, and the soundstage is comparable to big cans. The W3's perform better with imaging. Ever since I got IE8's, I barely listen to the W3's. In the near future, I'm probably going to sell them, or trade for a back up pair of IE8's. This is just my preference. There are many people who prefer the W3's over the IE8's. The IE7's have a smaller soundstage and less bass as compared to the IE8. If your not a basshead, the IE7 will be a better choice. Hope this helps.