Measuring flat and sounding flat are two different takes, I know D/S DAC's do not sound as real to me as my RTR and /or NOS DAC's. I have proven that to myself multiple times. Something always seems off. If everything measures perfectly flat, low distortion etc... why do components sound different?
In another post you stated ....You can show me the charts and plankton graphs all day long. I don't care....its what I the listener can discern. So why the concern over what I can discern. Clearly you think different individuals have different abilities to discern.
In that same post you also stated ..... I have tested against or rather compared it (MMB2)to three other dac's I have.
All costing a lot more. I honestly do not hear much difference in all of them.
Maybe you need to put in some time and REALLY listen. You seem to have already determined there are few if any differences in DAC's. I know without a doubt know how a component impacts my audio chain. Maybe you just don't care about the differences?
I have four DAC's 1543 x 8 NOS DAC, 1865 NOS DAC, 1387 X 8 RTR DAC and the MODI MB OG and I can definitely tell them apart. I have them hooked up to a switch box. Sometimes I don't pay attention to what is hooked up. But let me listen for a short time and I know which DAC I am listening to. Interestingly, I just got a new DAC today. A used Bifrost 1 OG with op amp mods in the IV and DC servo sections. Have had the DAC playing and listened with my M 1070 planars and WOW!. I can tell immediately this DAC has incredible dynamics, noticeably more resolution of space and depth and sibilance is slightly more present. But, I do not think enough to be a deal breaker. This DAC is clearly a step up over my MMB1. Plus, the RTR DAC's usually need to warm up to stabilize and sound their best. I hooked this one up cold minutes after the UPS delivery. So, the treble should hopefully smooth out more.
Most people do not listen like I do. I spend time .... days, sometimes a week or more until I truly understand what is different. Once I can identify differences I know if the product is for me. As I have said treble is where I am particularly sensitive and when I add a component to my audio chain I look for specifically for how the component handles treble first because that is one of my main priorities. If I ultimately determine there is excess sibilance, glare, fatigue I do not keep the component because I will not ever listen to the component. That is my priority and that is why I like to research other opinions and see what people think before I buy.
I do not use or even have any extra filters in my DAC's. I do not use any EQ. I am old school I use a cd player coaxial out. If the component does not work for me there is not much I can do. I do make paper/felt treble filters for some of my headphones per an article DIY Audio Heaven. But you can only filter so much before you start making the sound to closed in. So the component has to have certain traits and a certain level of performance determined by myself or I will not be happy with them.
My purpose for following this thread was to see what people think of the new MMB2 so I could decide if I wanted to buy one. Not to argue about your opinions of DAC's are all about the same or my discernment is somehow misplaced because you believe sibilance is only a product of the music. Sure you need music to hear a vocalist but a component can screw up the treble which was my point .... which you cannot seem to grasp. I will end this with I am going to listen to my new/used BF 1 OG and if this DAC performs well I doubt I buy another DAC. But, if I do, with the information in this thread and treads elsewhere my purchase will definitely be a MM2.
Back to AAB Live At The Filmore.