I know, so many great tubes to try.
I hear you but my comment was only about the spelling. I'm such an ass.
VosKHod.
PhiLips, SiemEns, …
I know, so many great tubes to try.
I hear you but my comment was only about the spelling. I'm such an ass.
VosKHod.
PhiLips, SiemEns, …
If these Amperex USN CEP 6922 white labels have a neutral sound like the HGs, do they still have that euphonic Amperex house sound, like (what I hear) the Bugle Boys have?
Just a hint of the euphonic Amperex sound - kind of like a subtle seasoning. I've noticed the very best of each family tend to converge on a wonderfully natural, tonally rich, deeply detailed sound. Just go about it from a slightly different perspective. They're all fun to listen to - and if you want superb sound but just want to change things up a bit - really nice to have them all in the collection. What makes tube equipment so versatile.
For me the big outliers are the 1950's Amperex Pinch Waist 6922 D getters - they sound so different. Uber, Uber Amperex euphonic - missing a layer of detail as compared to the '60s USN-CEPs, 60's Tele E88CC, '74 6n23p Relektor SWGP. Maybe two layers compared to the 6n23p '75 HG's, as they are the most detailed and revealing 6922 type tube I have heard. But the PWs do something that even the HGs' don't - just a unique presentation to vocals. Not natural, but really fun despite that. Think of 300b SET tonal richness. And very, very copious bass. Not as defined or balanced as the others - just loads of it. Not a tube I would listen to consistently - unless I had a very bright system. Or unless I liked liquid chocolate dripping all over my sound. They would be fun to have in the collection for occasional listening if they weren't so darn expensive at $500+/pr.
The Siemens CCa Gray Shield early '60s are also similarly great tubes, again with a subtle amount of the Siemens house sound. Very detailed, a bit treble rich in balance, great sound staging, etc...
How would you say the USN CEP sounds in comparison to a Amperex white PQ 6922? They are very close in price.
Thanks for the advice Bob. I just pulled the trigger on a pair of '60s Amperex 6DJ8 White Labels from mercedesman, which are apparently the same as the Bugle Boys. I'm looking forward to trying out the euphonic sound signature and seeing if it works for me! If a 1950s' Pinch Waist 6922 D Getter comes along my way some time...I might just be tempted...
Great write-up Bob. I'm a big fan of the American-made white print 7308 PQ's. Have a pair of '60 D-Getters and '65 O-Getters. Both incredibly revealing pairs, with surprisingly wide but strong at the edges sound stage presentation. Very "live" sounding tubes. A little less lush than my beloved Heerlen-made early 60's Philips Miniwatt SQ's and about 5 rows farther back in their overall presentation.
Gorgeous tubes.
+1 Thanks! I'm looking for a sweet pair of the Mullard CV2492s at a good price. I think I found a pr. These are much unrated tubes.
The '75 6n23p's HGs are still my day in day out favorites. I'm running four pairs now - the Lyr, two amps and my newly modded DAC. Sounding truly glorious!
Cheers my friend! Drink Well!
Might check with OldSkool on the Mullies if your deal on the CV2492 falls through. He is the Mullard King and may be interested. Then again, he may not.
.Thanks!
I
.
I used to have a pair of the Mullard CV4109's. Wish I would have hung onto them for the thicker, "tubier" signature I just started running with my WA2. The really good Mullies are a whole other ballgame for smooth texture. Not the most detailed tube in the world but perfect if you're looking for that Mrs. Butterworth sound.
Thick and rich.
Yeah that's fun sometimes. Oozing chocolate fudge kinda sound. The antithesis of the Siemens house sound. And way cheaper then the Ampy PWs.
Edit - The CV2492's received good marks on the old thread - have fallen out of favor on this one.
Hey guys, we need to know the the production codes on these CV2492's. They may well be identical to the standard Mullard 6922. The paint on tubes matters little. The production codes will tell all.
Most Amperex, Mullard, Philips and Valvo tubes are marked with a group of symbols which contain coded information relating to the type, place of manufacture or country of origin, and the date of manufacture.
There were two types of code formats that used the same tube type codes, which were in use from 1948 until these companies stopped the manufacture of standard receiving tubes. The code format changed about 1955 or 1956. There are some deviations to this rule, and in certain manufacturing plants not all of the code protocol was followed exactly, with every batch of tubes. Prior to 1955, Mullard used a purely numerical code for encoding the tube type, but then adopted the code change as listed here after that. Therefore, for tubes made after 1955 by all three of these large European manufacturers, the code is fairly uniform and straightforward to decipher using these code lists
7LI R9F3 KB-D |
7LI R9F5 KB-D |