Tungsram E80CC... what LISST should have been?
Now from what i've been reading there are 2 types of E80CC, ones that are Tungsram, and ones that.. well.. aren't. The others seem to have all been made by Phillips in Heerlen. I've read reviews that say the Heerlen's are warmer but less resolving, pretty much everyone prefer's the Tungsram, but to each their own
Been cooking this one for a while now and really enjoying it. It doesn't really sound tubey at all, sounds more like
good solid state, by which i mean fairly accurate but not too thin or clinical sounding
Tube is really fast and detailed, dry would be too harsh a word to describe it, accurate maybe? Not too coloured? Has quite a neutral signature but smooth, edges seem well rounded but not to the point you could describe as liquid. Bass has mild warmth and very good extension. Mids are neutral maybe a tad smoother than most tubes but again not quite liquid.
I'd say the treble is a little bright (for my taste) but most would describe it as neutral, my ears are accustomed to laid back treble, this has maybe a tad more zing and energy than i'm used to but very detailed.
Not the best tube in terms of imaging, soundstage not the widest but separation of instruments is good.
Overall it's the good kind of neutral, the kind of neutral that has a fullness about it.
If only LISST sounded like this,
Definitely worth rolling, but you'll need an adaptor for use in Lyr 3 due to having a 12v heater (which handily, is centre tapped)
Which reminds me i made my own adaptors for this tube back in Lyr 1 days as below (the black one) Basically converts E80CC to 6DJ8 other adaptor then converts to 6SN7 socket. The tube actually arrived in the post before the proper adaptor and i remembered i made these so had a rummage in the drawer and found a few still left over.
Looks a bit ridiculous fully assembled