nerone
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2014
- Posts
- 144
- Likes
- 150
Agreed. That's why I didn't say they should have done it.There is absolutely no point in trying to redesign Raal's connector choice.
Agreed. That's why I didn't say they should have done it.There is absolutely no point in trying to redesign Raal's connector choice.
I believe that a primary benefit of balance headphone connection is ensuring that the two drivers do not share a common (non-zero impedance) return line to the amplifier connection. Many TRS single-ended headphone cables have only three wires, so a signal on one channel creates an out-of-phase signal on the other channel. Better TRS cables will use a separate pair for each driver, with the grounds tied only at the amplifier-end TRS connector.Asgard is not balanced, thus my choice.
thanks for the info. I assumed (wrongly) that Stax was using the 5-pin version of XLR.the STAX connector and XLR are different.
RAAL SR1a don't use a 1/4" headphone jack, so the Jotunheim R doesn't provide one.
Looking forward to tomorrow... =)I'm just going to leave this here ...
Those paying attention will quickly realize what they're looking at...
---
(This unit is a "production-qualifier", as mentioned earlier by Jason).
Can confirm, Torq has one of the best views! Plus you know all the best listening chains while enjoying the views *sighs enviously* lolThat's just out on my deck.
Bingo. As Torq confirmed, the middle switch is baffle compensation for the SR1a, like the one baked into the speaker amp interface box. If there are other, more conventional, headphones in Raal/Requisite's future, you won't need the baffle compensation. So you can turn it off.
And the preamp outputs can be turned on or off with the third switch, to facilitate use for pros who may be using powered monitors. Unlike most of our preamp outputs, though, this one is simply a passive volume control; we didn't want to take the chance of someone connecting XLR to RCA adapters that may short one leg of the XLR to a stage capable of very very high current. Also notice that there is no 1/4" jack, and the 4-pin XLR is male, as per Raal standards.
A couple of other details that I've probably already covered: yes, this is a Nexus amp, like Ragnarok 2, and the one that Torq has also has a True Multibit card in it, but it takes the same cards as our other modular amps. Or no card.
Interesting, I didn't know there was a faux multibit...
I see you named your True Multibit architecture. What, was there a sale on trademarks or something?
No, we named it True Multibit™ because there’s a lot of confusion over what is really multibit and what isn't. Some companies refer to multilevel delta-sigma D/A converters (like the AK4490 used in the $99 Modi 3 and Fulla) as “Multibit” DACs. While kinda-sorta-maybe technically correct, this is pretty misleading. 2 to 5 bits of actual resolution plus massive amounts of noise shaping is not true multibit. Hence, True Multibit. We use True Multibit to denote DACs that have 16-20 actual bits, rather than multilevel noise-shaping delta-sigma DACs, coupled with our unique combination of time- and frequency-domain optimized digital filter, based on math first proposed by Western Electric in 1917, and developed into usable algorithms by a team that included a professor emeritus of math and a Rand Corp mathematician. It’s unlike any other digital filter today, and we believe it provides the closest thing to a true interpolation, while retaining the original samples as closely as possible.
And the preamp outputs can be turned on or off with the third switch, to facilitate use for pros who may be using powered monitors. Unlike most of our preamp outputs, though, this one is simply a passive volume control; we didn't want to take the chance of someone connecting XLR to RCA adapters that may short one leg of the XLR to a stage capable of very very high current. Also notice that there is no 1/4" jack, and the 4-pin XLR is male, as per Raal standards.
+1.I don't have an answer -- I just have the same question. I'm currently EITR'ing into a Modi Multibit too, and assume the EITR would become unnecessary (maybe even a downgrade?) from straight USB into the Bifrost 2?
+1.
Re: EITR-ModiMB pairing versus a Bifrost 2... I can feel my audio nervosa spiking. God, maybe they're commensurate? Dunno.
Before I pick up a Gungnir-MB... I'm still gung ho about another pair of headphones. According to the Steve Guttenberg, Audeze released the LCD-1 ... and apparently it's assembled in the states... and is on par with the other LCD cans. I still want that big, enclosed, LCD-XC sound. I'd like to think the LCD-1 will drive the other prices down (maybe?).
Magni SE.A handful of products have been moved to "Last Call" on the Schiit website:
Wyrd, Asgard (2), Eitr, Jil
Get 'em while they last...
@Ripper2860 ... intriguing! Meh, I have my EITR and it'll be paired up with my first love -- ModiMB. So it appears the Mani, EITR, and Asgard 2 are on close-out.Bifrost 2 w/ Unison for the win over Modi MB -> EITR, IMHO More detail and bass slam, with a slightly wider soundstage in my setup. Of copurse YMMV.
Besides -- one can use EITR with BF2 if one felt the need, but why? Unison is fully galvanically isolated. It's a better USB controller chip with essentially an EITR built-in.
I'm using a JJ on my Vali 2 (with a ridiculous socket saver and 6SN7-adapter). No regrets.Looks like they've replaced the TungSol 6SN7s with JJs as the available Replacement Tubes?
https://www.schiit.com/products/replacement-tubes