- me too. If I'm paying for the music, I want to know that it "
is as the artist intended".
LIke
@ArmchairPhilosopher, I have also spent most of my career in software development. But since I'm at least twice as old as he, it's been more like forty years... <g>. Fractal encoding works super well for image compression, but it's critically important to remember that it's a lossy algorithm. If the MQA organization wanted to embed a watermark / authentication code, they could do it by embedding an encrypted signature in the file header of a FLAC container, toot suite. Done.
The claim that "extended" musical data is "folded" into the file using n-dimensional bull-Schiit is patently ridiculous.
So, you're >82 years old? Good for you! Just make sure you don't throw your back out next time you move around those Tyrs of yours…
As for your comment about MQA: Spot on.
If MQA Ltd. (the company) wants MQA (the product) to be taken seriously, they would do well to first stop claiming patently ridiculous things that the laws of physics and no algorithm known to man could ever actually deliver. What they do is in no way different than a car salesperson telling you in all seriousness that the internal combustion engines in their model lineup deliver 1,500 horsepower at 500 miles a gallon efficiency, and that nothing but rainbows and butterflies comes out the tail pipes. Even the most gullible of nitwits would immediately begin their retreat back out the door, because what they're claiming is obviously impossible at best, and outright clinically delusional at worst. Yet somehow, MQA's marketing department does essentially just that, yet a good chunk of audiophila is gobbling it up like it'd be the best new thing since sliced bread.
Makes absolutely no sense to me. Well,
almost no sense, that is.
Thank you, thank you. I thought I was the only one who understood.
Subs with Quad electrostatic speakers is a nightmare. But I'm always having a hard time to convince people.
Big boom (not bass), is making big impression among your friends apparently.
Peter Walker once said it very nice in an interview many years back. If you have a sub in your playback system and play a pieces with cello(s), better turn it off if you don't want the cello to sound like an upright bass. (or something of those words) I could not agree more.
No need to thank me. It's not a matter of convincing anyone, it's just basic physics, whether someone likes to hear that or not.
Subs and ports exist to amplify frequency ranges that simply don't really exist in music that is created with purely acoustic instruments, like acoustic folk/rock, jazz, and classical. It's much more important to have a clear, accurate, and undistorted representation of 35Hz and up, especially without distortion in their respective harmonics. Artificially enhancing anything below 35Hz will impart a certain sense of "fakeness" to the sound. It might appear to sound more exciting and get your pulse up quicker, but it simply won't
feel accurate.
(And I say this as as HUGE Berlin Philharmonics fanboy, an orchestra that is considered to have the "darkest" sound of any professional orchestra on the planet, in part due to the fact that they exclusively use 5-string double basses.)
Again, ports and subs are great for pop and rock, or anything else that's naturally boomy and punchy. But if somewhat accurate reproduction of acoustic instruments is what you're after, you better plug those ports and switch off your subs.