there appears to be an adapter plugged into the Jotunheim 2's XLR-4pin. is that an XLR4 to 4.4mm pentaconn (TRRRS) ?
Yes. If I get aftermarket cables now, I terminate them all in 4.4 and use adaptors for everything else.
there appears to be an adapter plugged into the Jotunheim 2's XLR-4pin. is that an XLR4 to 4.4mm pentaconn (TRRRS) ?
Aeon 2 if you want foldability (portability), otherwise consider Aeon RT or pre-owned Ether 2 or Ether Flow Open 1.1 (but no warranty on those)
You need a Vali(um)I kind of want the new Vali but I don’t really NEED it. Anyone else have this problem?
Vali 2+ for the Uninitiated
In general a good cable is not the issue bandwidth-limiting Toslink S/PDIF, it's the sender and receiver encoding modules. Toshiba originally designed Toslink to pass 48KHz signals, and it is generally limited to 24/96. Getting speeds higher than that via optical is a hit and miss proposition.The 1300 strand cable from Sysconcept.ca. It should allow 192k through optical, but it doesn't seem to work with all DACs. The main thing is that you get electrical isolation from your source, which might reduce noise and hardness in the sound, though if the jitter is high, the DAC might generate noise itself as a result. They seemed to be best with portable gear that has optical output.
Jotunheim 2 is scheduled to arrive on Tuesday. Might be a bit later due to customs and such
The 1300 strand cable from Sysconcept.ca. It should allow 192k through optical, but it doesn't seem to work with all DACs. The main thing is that you get electrical isolation from your source, which might reduce noise and hardness in the sound, though if the jitter is high, the DAC might generate noise itself as a result. They seemed to be best with portable gear that has optical output.
In general a good cable is not the issue bandwidth-limiting Toslink S/PDIF, it's the sender and receiver encoding modules. Toshiba originally designed Toslink to pass 48KHz signals, and it is generally limited to 24/96. Getting speeds higher than that via optical is a hit and miss proposition.
I don't know if you could make such a general statement, but most Toslink outputs on computers are set at 16/44 as a default since that is the "normal" audio requirement.Am I right to say that in terms of bitrate, most computers will be stuck at 24/96 (unless they use USB) due to them having only TOSLINK ports?