Schiit DACs (Bifrost and Gungnir down, one to go)? The information and anticipation thread.
Nov 1, 2011 at 2:19 AM Post #1,306 of 3,339
Hey all:
 
1. We haven't experienced that error on Win7--in fact, the driver has simply worked with all the Win7, Vista, and XP systems we tried it with. All I can think is try to reinstall the driver, try it on another system, and let us know if it doesn't work. We'll also see what C-Media has to say about it.
 
2. A tiny amount of transformer hum can be normal (ear to chassis kind of thing), but I've never said excessive hum is normal--in fact, in the 6Moons review, I said we contacted the transformer manufacturer and changed the process to eliminate the hum, or at least dramatically reduce it. Which was done in 2010.
 
Hope this helps a bit.
 
All the best,
Jason
 
Schiit Audio Stay updated on Schiit Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/Schiit/ http://www.schiit.com/
Nov 1, 2011 at 3:13 AM Post #1,307 of 3,339
Re: transformer...
 
I am familiar with the 6Moons review and I do have an Asgard.  I believe the hum on my Bifrost is louder than my Asgard.  However, as the Asgard is at work, I will not be able to compare the noise level until tomorrow.
 
From your statement below, I take it that you would agree that the hum is excessive if it is greater than the amount of transformer hum on the Asgard?
 
As for the driver issue, I'll have another machine to try out at work (which is the intended machine for this DAC anyway).
 
Quote:
Hey all:
 
1. We haven't experienced that error on Win7--in fact, the driver has simply worked with all the Win7, Vista, and XP systems we tried it with. All I can think is try to reinstall the driver, try it on another system, and let us know if it doesn't work. We'll also see what C-Media has to say about it.
 
2. A tiny amount of transformer hum can be normal (ear to chassis kind of thing), but I've never said excessive hum is normal--in fact, in the 6Moons review, I said we contacted the transformer manufacturer and changed the process to eliminate the hum, or at least dramatically reduce it. Which was done in 2010.
 
Hope this helps a bit.
 
All the best,
Jason



 
 
Nov 1, 2011 at 5:22 AM Post #1,308 of 3,339
Amount of hum from transformers will greatly be influenced by DC component within local mains (110/220Vac) waveform. Some locations have great deal of DC component nowadays, which is causing saturation of iron core of a typical PS transformer.
It is almost always improvement if special Low flux and/or Air-Gapped Core mains insulation transformers are used for powering all electronics for audio applications.
 
Best to all,
Zelidu
 
 
Nov 1, 2011 at 6:38 AM Post #1,309 of 3,339


Quote:
 
General question: When listening to different DAC's, do you find the differences are more noticeable on headphones... or on speakers?
 
 
 
 

I do tests with headphones, just because if the room is not perfectly treated, you can hear substantial differences just moving your head a few inches here and there. That's where placebos come from.
 
 
 
Nov 1, 2011 at 7:07 AM Post #1,311 of 3,339
Quote:
 
It's just async'd 001011011101010011 I don't think glass will make a difference.
 



Mental models can be harmful when they leave out significant data.  There are no "zeros" and "ones" moving down wires in digital audio.  There is an analog signal that *represents* zeros and ones.  If it is an electrical signal, it is subject to the same sorts of problems as other electrical signals (noise through signal connection, noise through ground connection, interference from RF and other sources...).  An optical connection eliminates many of the problems with electrical signals but introduces others (for example, termination quality in optical cables is particularly important).
 
As always, the best and easiest way to tell if something performs better in your system is to listen.  (Being mindful, of course, of what Richard Feynman said: "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.")
 
Nov 1, 2011 at 7:20 AM Post #1,312 of 3,339


Quote:
 
General question: When listening to different DAC's, do you find the differences are more noticeable on headphones... or on speakers?
 
 
 
 



To my old ears I find that headphones are more resolving, especially if you have a Stax Lamba.  I judge all components with these and then thu my main rig which are 6ft ribbons that I have put together.  The differences are more noticable on cans then thru speakers
 
 
Nov 1, 2011 at 7:21 AM Post #1,313 of 3,339


Quote:
Quote:


Mental models can be harmful when they leave out significant data.  There are no "zeros" and "ones" moving down wires in digital audio.  There is an analog signal that *represents* zeros and ones.  If it is an electrical signal, it is subject to the same sorts of problems as other electrical signals (noise through signal connection, noise through ground connection, interference from RF and other sources...).  An optical connection eliminates many of the problems with electrical signals but introduces others (for example, termination quality in optical cables is particularly important).
 
As always, the best and easiest way to tell if something performs better in your system is to listen.  (Being mindful, of course, of what Richard Feynman said: "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.")


I don't claim to be an expert but surely that's backwards. The digital "zeroes" and "ones" you refer to represent the signal, not the other way round. If it was an analogue signal in the first place, what use would a Digital to Analogue Converter be? 
 
Nov 1, 2011 at 7:38 AM Post #1,314 of 3,339


Quote:
I don't claim to be an expert but surely that's backwards. The digital "zeroes" and "ones" you refer to represent the signal, not the other way round. If it was an analogue signal in the first place, what use would a Digital to Analogue Converter be? 



To transmit digital signal at long distances using 0 and 1 is limited to the medium it is done, to transmit these zeros and ones successfully it is done on an analog waveform that is modulated. this is also the same for optical transmission.  So the signal is modulated at the transmission end and demodulated at the receiving end that converts it back to 0 and 1 with error correction built in.
 
Nov 1, 2011 at 8:35 AM Post #1,315 of 3,339


Quote:
To transmit digital signal at long distances using 0 and 1 is limited to the medium it is done, to transmit these zeros and ones successfully it is done on an analog waveform that is modulated. this is also the same for optical transmission.  So the signal is modulated at the transmission end and demodulated at the receiving end that converts it back to 0 and 1 with error correction built in.


 
Well you learn something new every day. Anywhere you could recommend me to read up on this?
 
Nov 1, 2011 at 8:41 AM Post #1,316 of 3,339
Here are my gathering of info so far on this thread for the bifrost:
 
good sound stage and detailed sound
 
Lack of bass and base resolution
 
Doesnt beat $3k dacs
 
Has issues with curtain win 7 drivers thru usb as win m/c doesnt recognised the unit
 
Has loud clicking issues that is considered normal due to activation of relays when changing tracks!
 
No acknowledgement of possibilty of remote firmware upgrades on presently owned units
 
Hum issues, undefined whether its due to the transformer or is it thu audio outputs?
 
Hate to be -ve but what other things have I missed thats going to come under "normal" 
 
The hype for this product was so +ve but thats when noone has owned it.  My prediction is that once the review units reach there destination the write ups are going to be flowery!!
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nov 1, 2011 at 8:55 AM Post #1,317 of 3,339


Quote:
 
Well you learn something new every day. Anywhere you could recommend me to read up on this?


Look for topics such as analog/data transmission,  As you research this topic the details will overwhelm you, because in practice the measurements that are done during pracs sometimes do not prove the theory.  Good place to start is networking and connecting PCs
 
 
 
Nov 1, 2011 at 10:16 AM Post #1,318 of 3,339
What I have gleemed from this thread so far echohifi even though there have not been many of them out in the wild reporting back, is this is most probably one of the worlds best Dacs in its price range. But really to early to tell.
 
I also did not read that the clicking was loud. I thought it was when the bitrate changed not just from track to track.
Only one person has had trouble with Windows 7. (This must be a record when using a product with microsoft windows) :)
I must have missed the part that generaly the bass was lacking.
Only 1 person has had a hum problem that I can see.
 
I think your really trying to judge a product that you have not heard yet I take it?
I personally am looking forward to getting mine ASAP. Hopefully order 500 is comming up shortly.
 
Also don't think there are many Dacs in this price range that are user firmware upgradable.
 
 
Nov 1, 2011 at 2:40 PM Post #1,320 of 3,339
I don't know why folks are saying there's a lack of bass with the Bifrost. When I played Bach's Toccata and Fugue on it connected to the Lyr, it practically made my teeth wiggle.
Still no hum or clicking from my unit, either.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top