Well, I already have a phone. And I should be able to get a used SGS for around 40 dollars.... but yeah, I wont be upgrading my IEMs or cans in the near future. My sansa /is/ dieing slowly as i cant turn the jack in the headphone out because I might lose signal in one ear. So in a few months I will have to decide; new Sansa or used SGS? And then which would you recommend? Is it really better? Is it as flat (really like the flat Sansa output).
Unfortunately, it's not really as cut and dry as one being entirely better than the other.
It *can* be better than the Sansa. The amp in the SGS is much better than the amp in the Clip, especially with Voodoo Sound.
IMHO: If you don't plan on voodooing it and plan to use it stock, I wouldn't bother buying one. Subjectively, I found the WM8994 is (only mildly) warmer than the Clip...but not distractingly so and not to the detriment of detail extraction.
As with most android players, the software music player you choose will have a largest impact on the sound quality of the player (behind DAC/Amp implementation and floor noise from shielding.) On android machines, you'll have to make trade-offs for: player performance, UI features/aesthetics, and audio fidelity.
I find Neutron and USB Audio Player Pro to be the two best sounding players. However: Because of the single core processor in the SGS, it stutters on Neutron if you are running FLAC or ALAC files and have some of it's more processor intensive settings on. (To avoid this, I just re-encoded mobile files as 320 bitrate lame mp3's.) UAPP just plain won't install on any machine that doesn't have USB-OTG capability, regardless of whether or not you intend on using a USB DAC. Both Neutron and UAPP have ****ty user interfaces though. Beyond that, I find PlayerPro, RocketPlayer, DoubleTwist, GoneMad, JetAudio and Poweramp to all sound a little worse than the other two - but are more or less equivalent to each other. Poweramp runs the smoothest on the SGS though and has, IMO, the best user interface and appearance customization options.
TLDR: if you are using IEM's or headphones that will benefit from the more powerful amp, the SGS will definitely sound better than the Clip. If you don't, then whether or not the SGS will be a sonic improvement will depend on a few things:
- If you are comfortable enough with the Android operating system that you can unlock your bootloader and install a streamlined custom rom, you can get Neutron to run respectably - without processor intensive features. SlimBean is probably my favorite in this regard as it strips out everything superfluous. SGS + Neutron > Clip in terms of sound quality. It's a solid improvement.
- Using any of the other android music players, with headphones that don't benefit from amping, I found that the sound quality of the SGS1 vs the Clip is pretty much a wash. I wouldn't buy the SGS as an upgrade to the Clip in that regard, because the difference is just too small.
But if your Sansa is going to die anyway: for most applications, I found it was just nicer to have the SGS's AMOLED screen and robust build quality (especially for the AT&T SGS Captivate, which has a nice metal back plate. It's probably my favorite in the original SGS lineup.). For most uses, the SGS is just a really nice player from perspective of usability/quality-of-life. The exception being running and fitness, which the Sansa excels at because of it's easy shirt clip and low weight. If you can get one in nice shape for $40 and can put voodoo on it, go for it.