Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf18t /img/forum/go_quote.gif
In the case of the M3 you know that you get an excellent design, good quality parts, excellent specs and probably (I never heard the M3) something that sounds excellent.
DIY offers great value for money products, still a bit less when paying someone to build it for you. But, because the design and the parts list are public domain, you exactly know what's under the hood and you know what you pay for. This is rarely the case with commercial products.
As for sound quality we all know it's a subjective matter. It's certain if a bunch of people would had the chance to compare the M3 with the KICAS, a fraction would choose the M3 and the other fraction the KICAS. But if I had to blindly purchase between the M3 and the KICAS, without hesitation I would risk my money on the pro built M3 because you know what you buy and it will offer great value for your hard earned money.
|
That all makes sense... but... I'm really more focused on "the results," rather than the design and parts - does the sound quality exceed the GL and KICAS, and similar amps... for a similar investment... and... does it significantly exceed them???
Again... it seems to be a "no brainer" if you're a "techy" and can quite easily build one yourself... but... if you're a "layman" what is so unique about the amp, that would cause you to select it? I think the answer is clear... if you're a "techy," and you can maintain it and mod it yourself - you have no major investment in it... and don't have a lot of risk, if you can't sell it. For the "layman," however, it seems their is less risk in a "brand" name, which is more widely accepted by the market, than in a DIY product you may be stuck with.
Obviously... there would need to be a pretty significant and substantial justification to invest in a DIY amp that costs as much, or more, than a "brand" name." That's the nature of my question... what is that "significant and substantial justification" (sound quality, primarily) that is so great as to justify the greater "risk of investment" in a DIY amp.
I realize this is a difficult question for a "techy / DIYer" - because they cant' relate to the amp in the context of a "layman," who pays more for something they can't likely maintain, or modify.
It would be less of an issue... if... AMB, or whoever, provided a "kit" for a "layman," as Mapletree does. Their products have both "brand" identity, as well as, a "real kit" that any layman can assemble... not just a "techy."
That's my question... since I'm not a techy, why should I invest as much, or more, in "non-branded" product, that may be difficult to resell. There should be some real rationale that justifies that investment from a "layman's perspective (e.g. better sound quality for the same, or lesser, investment). So far... I'm not hearing / seeing that anywhere. No matter how rationale it is for a "techy" who can build it and maintain/mod it at a very nominal cost.