Trunks159
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2012
- Posts
- 3,340
- Likes
- 186
I've ordered the ws99s! I'll return whichever one is worse. I'll probably end up keeping the ws99s though.
I've ordered the ws99s! I'll return whichever one is worse. I'll probably end up keeping the ws99s though.
No, as the corrected graph is intended to show just how the headphone by itself reproduces sound. If you want to go by what your ear makes of that -- ignore FR graphs completely and just go by ear. Your ear geometry is not the same as the one in the measurement head anyway...
Next thing is: what quality is your EQ using (i.e. value of Q in the filter it represents)? Its much to coarse to ignore that... you'll introduce additional wobbles.
Anyway -- I'm against using an EQ in general. In situations where one is indicated either a decent analog 31-band implementation like the ones provided by Klark or BSS or a fully parametric digital one should be used. Home HIFI is not one of those places IMO.
Of course you'rre free to do what makes you happy. And your taste may be different enough from mine to justify things I wouldn't do
I think what matters most is the shape of your head and the angle of your ears.
I have a slim head and my ears sit relatively high, so I don't even have to extend the headband much. The pressure of the ear pads is very low - extremely comfortable! I do not hear the elevation in the presence area (2-3 kHz). I can easily reproduce it, though, by applying pressure on the cups. I can then further bend the sound by changing the angle of the cups.
I have also claimed in the past that my DT-880 @600 ohms does not extend well in the low frequencies. Some have called me crazy for that, but it's definitely how I hear it. The velvet pads do 'seal' (it's an open design, though), but the bass rolls off sooner for me. On the other hand, the highs are also not as harsh - I could have gone for Pro for a tighter fit, but that one was not comfortable enough for me.
So what I'm trying to say is, you should be really careful when discussing frequency measurements in detail. When I wrote the review on page 1, I did try to figure out how the sound changes with different pressure on the cups, but at the time too much pressure just sounded wrong (maybe that's what you hear).
'the corrected graph is intended to show just how the headphone by itself reproduces sound.'
¿Is the headphone by itself what we are going to listen when we put on them? ¿Or the headphone by itself + some effect of high frequency sounds amplification?
I don't like to disagree with people from Austria because I love Austrian chcolate! But this time, I have no choice. = D
As far as we are all human beings our ears are quite similar in many senses. I mean, our ear canals don't amplify 30Hz frequencies or 150Hz frequencies (as far as I know) And they amplify high frequency sounds. Here is when some differences could appear in the sound perceived by two or more people. But I think we all agree that our ears tend to amplify high frequency sounds.
Then I think that graphs that consider some kind of this effect give more usefull information than those which not consider it. At least in terms of getting the idea of how the measured headphone sounds.
I have two headphones measured by Innerfidelity. And to me they sound pretty similar to the grey graphs.
I've posted a picture of an Apple device EQ because probably most of the people use their Fidelios with Apple products. And because I found them better sounding with this EQ applied.
There is no Hi-Fi intends in my comments. In fact probably most of the people will agree that Fidelio L1 is not a Hi-Fi headphone. (Nice headphones, but lacks the clarity, and detail present in other headphones.)
I have to say that normally I prefer not to equalize, and this is the only headphone that I use with an EQ applied.
Best luck!
Next up: comfort.
Instead of praising Philips, I rather wonder what other companies do wrong. How hard can it be to build a comfortable headphone? You take a headband and put cushions in the inside. How can it be that AKG, Grado, Ultrasone, Sennheiser, etc. fail in this department? If you like the Beyerdynamic sound, you are lucky - because they are known for high comfort, even though the velour pads are a little itchy.