REVIEW: HLLY DMK-IV DAC / headphone amp / pre-amp)
Aug 20, 2010 at 2:18 AM Post #138 of 196
Looks interesting so far... :)
 
Just a few questions:
 
  • Is the volume control analog or digital (hopefully digital because of the non-ALPS Blue pot)
  • What did you use as output transistors for the headphone amp? (I imagine that's an class AB buffer?!)
  • Is the headphone amp dc-coupled?
  • Do the LEDs at the front just show the actual sample rate or is there an additional ASRC inside the SMK-III?
 
Thanks and regards.
bearmann
 
Aug 20, 2010 at 9:23 AM Post #140 of 196


 
Quote:
Looks interesting so far... :)
 
Just a few questions:
 
  • Is the volume control analog or digital (hopefully digital because of the non-ALPS Blue pot)
  • What did you use as output transistors for the headphone amp? (I imagine that's an class AB buffer?!)
  • Is the headphone amp dc-coupled?
  • Do the LEDs at the front just show the actual sample rate or is there an additional ASRC inside the SMK-III?
 
Thanks and regards.
bearmann



Hello:
 1.  the volume is analog, not digital!
 2.  Yes, it is class AB buffer circuit for the headphone amp!
 3.  Yes, headphone amplifer DC-Coupled!
 4.  The LEDs at the front just show the actual sample rate!
 
Over!
Thanks
 
Aug 21, 2010 at 3:32 PM Post #141 of 196
Waiting ... still waiting... 
biggrin.gif
 I am not very good at this waiting thing. 
wink.gif

 
David once again I thank you for the opportunity.
 
Aug 21, 2010 at 4:04 PM Post #142 of 196

very nice! rollable opamps apparently? for both the DAC I/V and headphones amp?
 
you could have added a WM8804 reclocker on all inputs via I2S to provide lower jitter, like in the Neko DA100 DAC and the Firestone BRAVO transport.
 
the 110/220V switch looks very dangerous to me, too easy to switch it by mistake and watch the unit melt IMHO.
 
Aug 21, 2010 at 6:24 PM Post #143 of 196
You can't just put tape over that switch? lol
 
Aug 23, 2010 at 2:47 AM Post #144 of 196


Quote:
[...] the 110/220V switch looks very dangerous to me, too easy to switch it by mistake and watch the unit melt IMHO.


I second that. A smaller switch would've been better ... regardless of any tape action somebody might want to do.
 
Aug 23, 2010 at 3:23 AM Post #145 of 196


Quote:
I second that. A smaller switch would've been better ... regardless of any tape action somebody might want to do.


Fine, epoxy putty.
 
Aug 23, 2010 at 11:06 AM Post #146 of 196
Hello:
 
    The switch on the back panel is power switch, not 110/220V switch!
    We will ship the DAC according to the country, if for USA/Canada/ Japan, we will ship 110V Version, if for Australia / Europe we will ship the 230V Version!
 
    Do do not worry about the switch, it is power switch!
 
-- David gao
 
Aug 23, 2010 at 11:10 AM Post #147 of 196


 
Quote:
Waiting ... still waiting... 
biggrin.gif
 I am not very good at this waiting thing. 
wink.gif

 
David once again I thank you for the opportunity.


Dear Miguel, the package is on the way to you now, EMS Express and the tracking number is EE425604153CN , you can tracking it in www.usps.com
We also send the AMK-II pre amplifier in the package!
 
Regards
 
  David gao
 
 
Aug 23, 2010 at 3:05 PM Post #148 of 196
I think that last post should have been a private message.
 
So it's the power switch. The labeling there is a bit misleading, maybe you should have a blank space there and print/write in manually if the unit is 110V or 230V.
 
Aug 24, 2010 at 1:37 PM Post #149 of 196
I would still be interested in a statement from david with respect to the advertised 24/96 capability of the DMK-IV which the actual units do not seem to support producing only static noise when fed such source material.
 
Aug 25, 2010 at 1:18 PM Post #150 of 196


Quote:
 

Dear Miguel, the package is on the way to you now, EMS Express and the tracking number is XXXXXXXX , you can tracking it in www.usps.com
We also send the AMK-II pre amplifier in the package!
 
Regards
 
  David gao
 


Thanks for the information David. I have checked with US Postal Service and ...
 
Detailed Results:
spacer.gif
spacer.gif
bullet_circle.gif
Inbound International Arrival, August 24, 2010, 2:45 am, ISC NEW YORK NY(USPS)
bullet_circle.gif
Foreign International Dispatch, August 22, 2010, 12:24 am, SHANGHAI EMS, CHINA PEOPLES REP
bullet_circle.gif
Foreign Acceptance, August 21, 2010, 6:55 pm
bullet_circle.gif
Origin Post is Preparing Shipment
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top