I decided to experiment some more. Since the Zenith SE has an "Ethernet out" port designed specifically for direct connection to a streamer, I decided to connect the dCS NB to this port. I suspect this is essentially a bridged LAN port (the first I have seen thus far in a mass produced Linux-based server) and sure enough, SQ from the dCS NB improved with regards to better clarity as if a thin veil had been removed. I decided to bridge the LAN ports on my custom server and connected the dCS NB to my custom server this way and this same SQ improvement was evident. Configured this way, the gap between the dCS and the Zenith SE has narrowed but given the choice, I think I would still go with the Zenith SE.
Hi Rajiv,
Great to see you contributing here in great detail, as your reviews have been and still are of great value to the audiophile community.
I have been using the dCS NB for a few months now and it’s an excellent machine. However, I firmly believe it was designed primarily for the legacy dCS DACs users, namely the Vivaldi DAC and the older series DACs with dual AES inputs (Scarlatti, Paganini, Elgar).
In my opinion, and based on some tests I have done, the magic with the NBR happens under these circumstances:
1. Dual AES connection to a legacy dCS DAC (in my case it’s the Paganini)
2. Word clock connection from the dCS NB word clock out to a legacy dCS DAC word clock input
I find these two features of the NB to be the crucial differentiating point between the NB and all other streamers on the market. If someone is to buy the NB in order to use a single AES or a SPDIF output to a non-dCS DAC without a wclk input, he will get a fine streamer and that’s it. But dual AES made a magical transformation in my system, and I am still baffled why is that so. The dynamics are so much better, the soundstage noticeably bigger with more air and transparency, the imaging superb. This is the point where the NB makes a great return on investment. Further improvements happen when you synchronize the clocks between the NB and the DAC (with the NB being the master and the DAC being the slave), but in my experience not as significant as the dual AES connection. But there is a catch. In order to get the most of the dual AES setup, you need really good cables, possibly exceeding the value of the NB itself. I have a pair of very expensive Kubala-Sosna Elation! AES/EBU cables on order which are to replace the pair of Transparent Reference cables I am using at the moment.
I have also found out that your old “bridged connection” tweak works really well with the dCS NB (even with a noisy server such as mine), which to my mind is a proof that the NB is not immune to upstream tweaks.
Now I am at a point where I need to decide what to go for in the server/Roon core department, and the Zenith MK2 is a candidate. I intend to use it just as you described, by connecting the streamer LAN output directly to the NB’s LAN input. So the Zenith would work only in Roon Core mode. However, I don’t have the possibility to test it prior to buying (no dealer in my country), so I wonder whether it will be a noticable improvement over a NUC or a SonicTransporter i5 in such scenario.
What is your recommendation?