I find this interesting. In Jude's comparison of the 13's and 16's he said
" Listening to music with little to no content below 100Hz results in a virtual toss-up between the JH13 Pro and the JH16 Pro, though still they're not exactly the same (but close enough to, again, be a virtual toss-up). Treble performance, by the way--one of the JH13 Pro's great strengths--is just as good with the JH16 Pro, with all the detail, extension and shimmer of the JH13. "
But in Warp's comparison he is hearing sonic differences in frequencies other than the bass, hmmm...
In one of the many comparisons he said:
JH13: "Good bass tonality and transparency. Bass is not overpowering, just present. Piano solo nicely rendered in midrange. Percussion lives in the background, sometimes seems missing. This is a robustly rendered recording, but forward sounding. Sounds like the whole track lives between lower and upper midrange spectrum. What happened to cymbals?
JH16: Awesome dynamic in opening sequence. Lushness all over, cymbals are back. Lenny’s singing no longer carries the entire tracking. Piano and bass harmonics allow picturing of an expansive local, missing from the previous representation. I think the extended headroom is paying off here big time! Interestingly, Lenny sounds like a carbon copy from the previous JH13 session. Overall, far more emotional representation of the atmosphere, truly musical. Bravo!"
Here's another comparison:
" Dynamic Test - Best of Chesky Jazz, Vol 2
JH16: Smashing drum solo, perfectly rendered.
JH13: Starts up identically until about 45 seconds.Less robust, tuned more towards cymbals and treble emphasis. A good copy, but not convincing.
Winner: JH16 "
I'm lost now, how is this possible?, the other minute ago the 13's didn't render cymbals now it's showing a preference for cymbals. I'm confused? =/