- Joined
- Jun 24, 2009
- Posts
- 3,244
- Likes
- 923
Looks to be totally solid state. (Says solid state and I don't see any through the "holy yin/yang" on top)
Yes but, in his review he states "The CLL doesn’t have costly upgrade options, and it doesn’t need expensive NOS tubes to sound great." That tells me there may be tubes in the LL. That's why I am asking for a clarification.
I am going to be busy for a bit but skimmed the review. Question: what amps have you owned in the past/now that you've listened to with the SR009? The Woo WEE (that's all I saw mentioned, but again I skimmed)? And the rest of the comparisons are from a meet with different sources?
SS uh yeah, so what's under the hood?
Design topology begs to be seen. Not just a front panel.
Guess we'll just have to wait for some early adopters.
It did nothing wrong and most everything right. It had an element of emotion and musicality that I felt simply didn’t exist with the BHSE.
I personally liked the SR-009 with the CLL better than with the BHSE, but the O2Mk1 with the BHSE represented an excellent combination.
I'm not saying it needs to look as good as a Pathos or EAR, but something better than just a black slab with some blue writing would be a start.
Any idea what Cavalli chose for volume control? Is it a pot or a stepper?
From what little i know, the pre=production version featured in this review apparently has a stepper in it, but the production will almost surely have a potentiometer.
Decent write up Pras. Looking forward to hearing the amp myself soon.