[walkingman]

Hmm... one of the patch has dislodge itself from port 3 and is now stuck inside the Quattro. I doesn't seem to have any noticeable effect to the sound signature but it does mean one of my port 3 screw is now essentially a spare port 1...

Anyway I have completed a 30 hour intense burn-in process and the sound coming out of this is pretty good. It is clear though not as good as the CX 95 or Radiopaq Jazz. I also would still prefer if the vocals were a bit more forward.

 

[toughnut]

Jon, try to further burn-in process. I find myself reaching for it more than X3 or KSC75 hahaha. It's fun and discrete IEM. The vocal quite laidback though, but iirc, similar to IE8 vocal placement.

 

[shinyu]

so woody is supposed to be higher end than quattro yeah? i was thought that woodie is about in the same range as x3i

 

[walkingman]

Quote:

Originally Posted by toughnut /img/forum/go_quote.gif Jon, try to further burn-in process. I find myself reaching for it more than X3 or KSC75 hahaha. It's fun and discrete IEM. The vocal quite laidback though, but iirc, similar to IE8 vocal placement.

I am going to continue burning them in as I do notice some improvements from pre-burn in to the last time I heard it. My S739 is now relegated to a burn-in DAP! Poor thing...

 

[DTKZ]

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClieOS /img/forum/go_quote.gif I asked Uncle Wilson about the sound signature of Woody 1 v.s 2 and he has confirmed that Woody 1 is the bassy, darker sounding one while Woody 2 is the airy, detail sounding one. I can only assume the problem lies on the demo units.

I would hope that the problem was with the demo units. I thought the Woody 2 was shockingly bad.

 

[Fizban]

Quote:

Originally Posted by wizardii /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm selling off my 1 day old woody two for those interested kindly msg me at 96935624... I realised i like my my old crossroads XBi better...

Hey dude, you probably just had a case of poor QC set of Woodies.

I had like 5 pairs of faulty imbalanced ones before i found my current pair.

 

[oyjandrew]

Anybody knows how the um1s fare as compared to the woodys? Really like my woody's sound but tired of having to change so often

 

[shigzeo]

i have the quattro now and the turbine, the pfe - i am a sucker! however, out of the three, my least favourite is the pfe, but that is just preference. they don't fit for me without discomfort. that is not usual. most find them very comfortable. the sound is great.

the quattro are nice looking though the filters are a bit wonky. the cable is not bad and for the money, they are, i think worth it. however, if find them not as good as expected when using the 2 and 1 ports with ANY ear tip. i will have an official review in a couple of weeks, but at the moment, i am not impressed unless i use port 3. the others are way too warm and strangely bassy.

but, good phones. the turbine i think have a more pleasing sound for me, but... their cable is ... really needs help.

 

[ClieOS]

Quattro will need burn-in and the final sound signature is quite different from the initial. You will definitely need to give it some time.

 

[casper]

Has anyone bought a Woody 1 or 2 lately? I heard this is a different batch from the original one and I was wondering if some of the QC issues may have cleared up.

FYI if anyone was wondering these are 98 bucks shipped to the USA. Just spoke to them through email.

 

[audio123]

is it too late to try a quattro now? the sound is wow