Can you somehow please figure out how to make them more efficient! Like seriously. You will have a bigger and wider market and maybe even a more dominating force if you can somehow use them with a normal headphone amp.
I want a someday project to be using a ribbon tech through a headphone jack on my cellphone!
If not, I see Hifiman or Audeze might beat you to this first!
And please, for other stop justifying nonsense speaker amps. I want normal headphone amps. Don't care about speaker amps are better debate.....
I hear you! But Physics is Physics.
I'll explain.
For the next model, I can reduce the power need to 1/4. What 100W does now, 25W will do about the same and that's it, when it comes to True-ribbon transducers.
They are made of Aluminum foil only, which is not bonded to any substrate.
That means that you can't etch the leads like on Planars and Quasi-Ribbons and get the desired resistance, as the metal must remain a continuous sheet or it wouldn't push air.
I'm sure that Planar-savvy people will use their plastic-metal foil and stretch it long and call it a Ribbon, as it has been done so many times before in speakers...but that would be deceiving and never have the sound of True-Ribbons.
If it will have a bunch of magnets arranged in a grill in front and behind the diaphragm, all the interference and turbulence problems will remain with it. Also, the resonances of the planar foil will remain, etc., so that would be a Planar, only a long-ish one.
If it will have magnets on the side and be clamped only top and bottom, it can be called a Quasi-Ribbon.
We will probably do it in the future, but we will call it what it is, a Quasi-Ribbon, we won't try to deceive you and slip it under you like you're an idiot
True-Ribbons actually got the prefix "true" because of proliferation of all the mimics that claimed to be Ribbons...