PX-200 ii vs AKG K430
Feb 7, 2011 at 10:44 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 7

dilkrac

Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Posts
65
Likes
10
Which one should i go with?
 
I listen to mostly acoustic music, little bit of rock, and some female vocals. I think i need mid and high as far as the sound goes. I really wish i can listen to them before i buy but i just can't.
 
Also, how is the durabilty of them? I don't want any issue especially with the cord.
 
Please help me
 
Feb 28, 2011 at 3:30 AM Post #3 of 7
This is something I would love to know as well. I'm in a dilemma!
 
Jan 15, 2012 at 7:17 PM Post #5 of 7
I have had both the K430 and the PX200-II. My vote goes to the ATH-ES55 actually as the best of the 3 top mini closed portables(Q460 / ES55 / PX200-II) but if those are the only two choices the PX200-II wins over the K430. The Senn has better mids and build quality and would be better for acoustic/female vocals.
 
Jan 16, 2012 at 12:38 AM Post #6 of 7
The PX200II($76) is around double the price of the K430($40) though, at least in the US. Is it worth double? The JVC HAS650 is closed, compact, has warm sound(probably warmer than the PX200I, more like the PX100), and only $34 on Amazon. The headband doesn't fold though, however the driver enclosures rotate to the flat position.  It is very efficient, as is the K430.
 
The ATH-ES55 is even more expensive than the PX200II.
 
Jan 16, 2012 at 4:36 AM Post #7 of 7
I've never used the K430, so I can't say anything for that, but I've owned the PX 200-II for about two years now, and they are holding up fine. The cord seems fairly durable, it hasn't given me any trouble so far, however I don't use them very much when I am on the move. The straight jack isn't my preference, but it is solid enough. They perform pretty well on acoustics and female vocals sound quite smooth with it. Portability-wise, it's fine, the headband is very comfortable even though it's just two pieces of sponge, and it should suit your tastes just fine. 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top