pabbi1
Cavalli Audio Spiritual Advisor
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2004
- Posts
- 3,879
- Likes
- 38
Quote:
Now, Marc, you know better. It is my G_d given right to suffer intimately with every cluster forked component on the planet, in the most non-sensical combinations possible.
Not a bad idea, if only more than one of my amps actually worked at the same time, your suggestion would be fairly reasonable. Oh, and Alex would be building me a LOT of cable.
Seriously, who woulda thunk attenuators that I have used in other applications would fail in such a way (assuming I replicated the same wiring diagram that I have executed in at least 2 previous build successfully) ?
Again, it brings us back to the shrinking possibilities of attenuatorsto use, the JT and it's ilk not withstanding.
The Goldpoints are excellent in the BH, and probably should stick with them, but there ain't nothing like the feel of something new...
Originally Posted by luvdunhill /img/forum/go_quote.gif Al: with so many amps, why not just build a single attenuator box and then have output selector to control each of your amps? Then, just pull all the pots and steppers out and be done with it |
Now, Marc, you know better. It is my G_d given right to suffer intimately with every cluster forked component on the planet, in the most non-sensical combinations possible.
Not a bad idea, if only more than one of my amps actually worked at the same time, your suggestion would be fairly reasonable. Oh, and Alex would be building me a LOT of cable.
Seriously, who woulda thunk attenuators that I have used in other applications would fail in such a way (assuming I replicated the same wiring diagram that I have executed in at least 2 previous build successfully) ?
Again, it brings us back to the shrinking possibilities of attenuatorsto use, the JT and it's ilk not withstanding.
The Goldpoints are excellent in the BH, and probably should stick with them, but there ain't nothing like the feel of something new...