Mrvile
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 3,391
- Likes
- 13
Cool pic, contrastique.
Here's a very tight crop of a pic I took a long time ago:
Here's a very tight crop of a pic I took a long time ago:
Originally Posted by Mrvile /img/forum/go_quote.gif Cool pic, contrastique. Here's a very tight crop of a pic I took a long time ago: |
Originally Posted by duderuud /img/forum/go_quote.gif Very nice pic. What equipment did you use? |
Originally Posted by hYdrociTy /img/forum/go_quote.gif that is the life eh contrastique |
Originally Posted by hYdrociTy /img/forum/go_quote.gif that is the life eh contrastique |
Originally Posted by kin0kin /img/forum/go_quote.gif I think I've gotta get a cheap CRT to view photos some time down the road. The photos look alot more similar to those actually developed at the photo lab...but also alot less vibrant than what I see on my LCD at home... |
Originally Posted by Chops /img/forum/go_quote.gif I don't know why people insist on thinking that CRTs still look better than LCDs... They don't! If you have a really good quality LCD, and have it calibrated correctly, it will blow away any CRT that you put it up against. I have had everything from ViewSonic to Sony Trinitron to Silicon Graphics CRTs, all 19" or 21", some of which cost upwards of $600, and none of them can compare to the two Samsung 22" LCD widescreens I have. The Samsungs are sharper, cleaner, whites are white, blacks are black, flesh tones are spot-on, shadows and hgihlights retain detail, everything is just so much better. Just an FYI, I do photo editing and graphics for a living, so I need to know a thing or two about monitors. Just my 2 cents. |