Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercuttio
Seriously though, the RS1 can be thin and brittle out of solid state amps and bright sources. That's the way it works. If you really want to hear what it can do, a beefy tube amp is in your future. You'll get all the weight and versatility you need out of the RS1 if it's properly driven.
|
That I can now believe....this is a good time for some RS1 initial impressions
First and foremost - I thought the whole comfort issue was blown out of proportion. But after 25 minutes of listening, it was not really a question of discomfort/pain - more along the lines of numbness on the part of my ears
And to go with that, someone in the house thought I was having an allergic reaction due to how red my ears were!
I ran it through the same setup I ran all previous cans through - foobar-->GCHA-->RS1. The most dramatic thing I noted was the presence and slam, the "in your face" attitude. I know I know...sounds cliched....but it't the truth! On numerous tracks, sounds and background instruments I had previously categorized as nuances become fundamental elemtents. Whether that is how they were meant to sounds is a different story altogether.
On some tracks this can be a good thing, but on many it means that there is almost too much information, such that you cannot layer things into forefront and background and they sound as if they are all on the same acoustic layer. This does NOT however affect detail...on the contrary, it allows you to hear very fine details and minutiae in the recordings.
Now I know what people meant when they said "Grados ROCK". I found myself flipping through numerous classic rock albums I had almost forgotten about - Bon Jovi, Queen, Def Leppard, Roxette....they sounded fantastic. And that actually summarizes it for me: great for rock...
...what I mean is that, if my primary listening material were those, these would fit the bill without a doubt. However, I am having doubts on whether I will make too much use. They did not fare too well on Jazz ("screech" comes to mind) or light operatic/vocal ("earbleed" comes to mind)....the voices were TOO "loud". On new age/chillout music it was great for its detail, but lacked the spaciousness that those recordings required...you cannot listen to Cafe Del Mar type music being front row IMO
In conclusion, I think that for those who listen primarily (read entirely) to rock....or those lucky ones that have 3, 4, 5 etc. 'phones in their collection, these are a crucial and great addition. However, I do not think I will be able to justify it seeing that they may only be called upon on the rare occassion or for 5% of the albums I have.
Who knows...these are just initial impressions...more listening needs to be done. I am also awaiting a tube amp and will see how it fares with that. But of importance also is the fact that I like to listen for 1-2 hours at a go, so comfort may be another barrier.
Cheers,
X
PS. I am going to the UK this week and upon my return (after giving my ears a well-deserved and well-required breather) I will be testing the '06 DT880 and the ATH-W5000...both of which have tremendous reputations and are threatening an entrance into my collection
PPS. I am taking this opportunity to punt my WTB advert....looking for an Equinox cable for the HD650s, so if anyone has one they may want to part with please PM me ASAP