CrystalT
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
- Posts
- 756
- Likes
- 34
Mine have a fair bit of sub-bass under 100hz. It's impressive for an open-air can, but not a lot in comparison to closed cans.
If that is the case, then something is wrong with mine, or these have anemic response under 100hz. There is literally nothing there. No bass whatsoever, in any form. The mids and highs are crystal clear, yet it feels like a crossover cut off any and all low end. I thought it was just because they needed more power.
Have you tested it with bass tones? Mine produce solid bass from 30Hz on up. The better the amp I use, the better the results but they still kick butt on my Galaxy S4.
I just tried it on my dad's old but very powerful Onkyo stereo amp, and it was much improved. Separation and imaging are excellent, but I still needed to bump 30-80hz up about 10db to be acceptable. They're burning in on it now.
It is tough to adjust to, as I have a home theater system made of DIY speakers and subs that are flat to 10hz. My towers are full range to 20hz flat even.
I'll give it more time, but it just might not be the sound signature for me, which is a shame because I love the soundstage.
Im not a believer in break in. You may as well return them now. They wont satisfy your bass needs.
Sent from my SPH-L300 using Tapatalk 2
I've got DIY subs and I've built a few speakers as well and I can go flat (or hot) to about 14Hz, because I built LLT tuned to 16Hz. Anyhow, at first the decreased bass and extension seemed like an issue, but in time I came to truly appreciate these Pioneers. You wind up appreciating different tracks, in different ways. They make treble exciting.
Im not a believer in break in. You may as well return them now. They wont satisfy your bass needs.
Sent from my SPH-L300 using Tapatalk 2
Sometimes I think you make liking these headphones tough. Seriously, people will have different opinions.
Can anyone tell me how the mids are on these headphones? I heard they are amazing but are they slightly forward and engaging? I really prefer neutral headphones that have a forward and lively/sweet mid range and these were recommended. Right now I have the Ht-21 and they sound pretty amazing for the price.
Theyre open headphones and the guy wants response on par with dedicated subwoofers.
Seems like his priorities are misplaced.
Sent from my SPH-L300 using Tapatalk 2
No, I want as close to flat response from the advertised10 - 30,000Hz range as possible, even just to 30hz, but instead I fell for the Head-Fi flavor of the month hype. The excellent soundstage cannot make up for the missing response from 100hz down that I'm getting in mine. 80-100hz is not a hard task, even for open headphones, and I am entitled to my opinion.
No, I want as close to flat response from the advertised10 - 30,000Hz range as possible, even just to 30hz, but instead I fell for the Head-Fi flavor of the month hype. The excellent soundstage cannot make up for the missing response from 100hz down that I'm getting in mine. 80-100hz is not a hard task, even for open headphones, and I am entitled to my opinion.
No, I want as close to flat response from the advertised10 - 30,000Hz range as possible, even just to 30hz, but instead I fell for the Head-Fi flavor of the month hype. The excellent soundstage cannot make up for the missing response from 100hz down that I'm getting in mine. 80-100hz is not a hard task, even for open headphones, and I am entitled to my opinion.
These aren't FOTM - They're extremely solid open air cans. They just aren't your cup of tea.