markl
Hangin' with the monkeys.
Member of the Trade: Lawton Audio
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2001
- Posts
- 9,130
- Likes
- 49
The other thing to keep in mind is that SACD is a format in its infancy. You're comparing a fully mature fomat (vinyl) with what, 80 years of development behind it, to one with 4 years or so. Not making "excuses" for SACD, just making a point.
Look how far CD sound has come in the last 20 years of it existence (all the way from completely disappointing to merely acceptable
). SACD technology, native DSD recording, matering techniques/eqipment, and players will progress as well and continue to sound better and better, so we haven't seen all that it can/will do by a long shot.
All that said, I don't see how anyone will ever convince the vinyl junkies that there is something better. I suspect that if it doesn't sound like vinyl, they'll think it's "wrong" no matter what its positive qualities. Also, psychologically, vynil heads are emotionally invested in the format, as they've held out for years against the onslaught of digital, becoming somewhat marginalized in the process, having to obsessively hunt down harder and harder to find vinyl treasures. With all that history it would take a bit of pride-sawllowing to switch over to digital now.
Myself, I never owned a turntable or LPs, so I can't really contribute to the SACD vs. vinyl comparison (but I certainly can contribute to a SACD vs. CD debate). Started with cassette tapes and switched to CD in the late 80s. So I was never biased in favor of the vinyl sound.
markl
Look how far CD sound has come in the last 20 years of it existence (all the way from completely disappointing to merely acceptable
All that said, I don't see how anyone will ever convince the vinyl junkies that there is something better. I suspect that if it doesn't sound like vinyl, they'll think it's "wrong" no matter what its positive qualities. Also, psychologically, vynil heads are emotionally invested in the format, as they've held out for years against the onslaught of digital, becoming somewhat marginalized in the process, having to obsessively hunt down harder and harder to find vinyl treasures. With all that history it would take a bit of pride-sawllowing to switch over to digital now.
Myself, I never owned a turntable or LPs, so I can't really contribute to the SACD vs. vinyl comparison (but I certainly can contribute to a SACD vs. CD debate). Started with cassette tapes and switched to CD in the late 80s. So I was never biased in favor of the vinyl sound.
markl