Back then, the music definitely sounded much better in my head than it did on my equipment.
Doesn't it still? And to a certain extent, won't it always?
an arbitrary benchmark.
And instead of making that benchmark something a computer spits out and says is "neutral" based on one methodology and set of assumptions or another, or else what a bunch of people with motivations, tastes, and priorities different from your own agree is "correct," why not make that benchmark the way music sounds in your head, unspoiled by any equipment whatsoever?
Well, we need a common reference.
Having some kind of external reference point helps us to: communicate with each other in the absence of a shared audition; share/compare gear experiences with each other; and yes - sometimes - evaluate gear for one another (as is the case with reviews).
However, I am with you 100% with regards to how far people take that benchmark in terms of importance - too far. It's one thing for everyone to agree that we can have a
common point of reference. It's something ENTIRELY different when people start insisting that point of reference is somehow
right or
correct as you pointed out earlier. That's generally when someone goes off the rails IMO.
I remember the first time I heard Spanish Harlem by Rebecca Pidgeon on the Chesky Ultimate Demonstration Disc.
I was so rapt in Rebecca's voice, it was only on subsequent lintening I realised the track was not acapella.
I truly believe sometimes we all suffer/are blessed with this phenomena to varying degrees.
This is why it is very important to audition HiFi gear with material you know very well.
And like.
Let's not forget the like... or in Mercer's case the pure and unadulterated love that is a piece of heaven itself. Joshin' ya bro.
There are certain "audiophily" tracks that we all know... some of us very well... but that doesn't mean we like them. I don't fire up Krall or Jones when I'm just looking to have a good time with my music. I might do it for a review, but I'd rather not if possible.
For me, the source of all this is the music, not the sound. If people want to geek out on the sound all day long, that's fine too. But chances are I probably don't have a lot to talk about with that person. I'm certainly not enjoying the same thing that person is enjoying during an audition.
Always use something you're familiar with, something that grabs your heart.
Yeah, what he said.
For me, a great sound system ultimately disappears - gets out of its own way, leaving just me and the music.
I have an ever-so-slightly different take on this. For me, there is music on some media somewhere. It should be in me, but it isn't. So now I need all kinds of hardware to get it in me. Fine, that's cool, it is what it is.
The problem for me is that every one of these devices - by virture of its very existence - effs with my music. So for me, I'm literally searching for that which effs with the music in the least offensive way possible. Bloat effs with my music. Sibilance effs with my music. Mids that sound like felines in heat eff with my music. Rolled-off highs eff with my music. And if something starts to eff with me and mine too much, well then that maternally-fornicating thing has got to go.
I don't think I'll ever be able to find gear that truly disappears, though I will spend the rest of my life searching nonetheless. But in the meantime, I'll settle for not being effed with too much.
^^^ @mikemercer - nice article. I just finally figured out what I like best about your writing. You are an explosion of emotion and enthusiasm just looking for a place to happen. It leaps out of your writing, and makes it a blast to read. Nicely done!
And having met him, you KNOW that this his writing is a true representation of the real him.
The Mercer is the Mercer, whether in person or in print.
Sh__, here we go with the bromance again....
LOL!