So after 25 hours or so of testing with various HP and Rectifier tube /SS PSU combinations, here are my rankings. 300B and 6SN7 tubes are kept constant. I will also state the impedance output as it has significant influence on its dynamics.
Will also read out what the mA meter says on the amp so everyone can get a feel on how the rectifier tubes changes things. The change from swapping rectifier tubes itself provides more significant difference than listening to different SS amps.
300B: PSVANE HiFi Series
6SN7: Sovtek (6h8c)
HPs: HEDDphone/ LCD-4z
Rectifier Tubes: JJ GZ34S, Sophia 274B Clear version, GEC U52 brown base
Rankings:
=1 (LCD-4z + SS PSU, Lo Z) 68mA on meter
Best performing from a technical standpoint. Best balance in FR across the spectrum. Soundstage, imaging and layering are the best. Instruments are placed in 360 space with very corporeal seperation of disance from the listener. Hearing details from tracks I did not hear before. Microscopic details and textures are presented very clearly such as from violin strings and guitar plucking. It has the speed of SS to render these very clearly but the harmonic richness of the 300B to enhance the sound. Very relaxing listen, 'ease-ful' sounding and minimal listening fatigue.
=1 (HEDDphone + GEC U52, Hi Z) 60 mA on meter
Loses out abit in instrument depth layering, but still good placement around 360 space. Has very good speed but the 300B sound is even more significant. Vocals feel powerful and have much more body. Highly engaging and emotional experience. Loses out abit on detail retrieval, but textures are still rendered clearly but with even more harmonic richness and weight. Never thought my HEDDphone can sound this engaging. Tube reverb is strong. Very edge-of-your-seat listening experience.
2 (HEDDphone + JJ GZ34, Hi Z) 70 mA on meter
Same as above with GEC U52 but even more intense and visceral. Soundstage becomes more narrow. You get more impact and slam. Good imaging and placement around 360 space but doesn't have same open feeling as the GEC U52. Tube reverb is significant but not as abundant and smooth as with the GEC U52
3 (LCD-4z + GEC U52, Lo Z) 63 mA on meter
Same as with HEDDphone but LCD-4z is already coloured so relatively speaking its not as well balanced as with the pairing with the HEDDphone. Vocals are more intense and full bodied but doesn't have same level of detail retrieval and sense of ease as the SS PSU pairing.
4 (HEDDphone + SS PSU) 66 mA on meter
Same level of technicalities as the LCD-4z + SS PSU, but relatively speaking, lacking harmonic richness and abit on the bland side compared with the other configurations
=5 (LCD-4z + Sophia 274B, Lo Z) 47mA on meter
=5 (HEDDphone + Sophia 274B, Hi Z) 45mA on meter
Sophia 274B provides the most relaxing listening experience. This is your typical lush and slow 300B amp sound. miss out alot on detail retrieval and instrument placement. Soundstage is largest here, but instruments seem to be coming from some distance from some point afar. 'Image-lock' is not very strong here. Treble is very sweet and bass is very thumpy. Mids are good too but nothing as visceral the GEC U52 or the JJ GZ34.
6 (LCD-4z + JJ GZ34, Lo Z) 70mA
Good speed but its too thick for me. Feels abit congested relative to the rest. Impact and slam are on another level but just too much for me at the end of the day
___________________________________
Hopefully this mini-review can be of some use. It can at least highlight the merits and uses of the Dual PSU option, and how it affects the sound. If you have a lot of headphones with various impedances, I think this is a very must have feature.
I feel that the results from the HEDDphone are a applicable for hard to drive HPs like Susvara and 1266. The results from LCD 4z are applicable to more of your sensitive planars like Meze Empyreans/Elites, Final D8000 etc.