raoultrifan
Headphoneus Supremus
That is not the spec of the IC. That is the spec of the sample circuit fed with +-5V.
That's exactly what I said after in my previous post.
Thank you!
That is not the spec of the IC. That is the spec of the sample circuit fed with +-5V.
I spoke to AGDR and here are his comments"
The OPA1688 can do way more than 50mW into 32ohms (before clipping) with higher chip source voltages, like the +/-12Vdc in the O2 if running on AC.
An OPA1688 should be pretty much equivalent to a NJM4556A in terms of power dissipation. A person might ask how can that be, given the NJM4556A is a DIP-8 package, while the OPA1688 is smaller surface mount SOIC-8 package? The answer is the dramatically reduced idle (quiescent) current of the newer OPA1688 part. The Iq of the OPA1688 is just 1.8mA max per amplifier, 3.6mA total, vs a whopping 12mA maximum total for the older NJM4556A. That means the about half of the NJM4556A’s package power dissipation is taken up just dissipating its own idle current! At +/-12V (12V – (-12V) * 12mA = 288mW. So although the OPA1688’s package is smaller, it has a lot more dissipation “room” left for the signal.
Alex
The most elegant way would be to change R14 and R20 to something lower than 10K IMHO.
The lower this resistor, the more signal gets shunt to ground, while the resistor(R3/R7, i guess standard value was 100 Ohm) which the signal has to pass, which is responsible for noise, can be left untouched.
The filter characteristics still work too: