The same stereo codec DAC33, the same amplifier TPA6130.
Разница лишь переходных емкостях между ЦАПом и УНЧ, 2,2мкФ на 5800 и 1.5мкФ на 5310 дросселя после УНЧ на уши у 5310 два отдельных у 5800 два в одном корпусе, но идентичные по параметрам.
The only difference between the transient vessels DAC and VLF, 2.2 uF at 5800 and 5310 1.5mkF on the throttle after the VLF to the ears in two separate 5310 from 5800 two in one package, but identical to the parameters.
Питания по схеме одинаковые.
Power under the scheme are the same.
Да, еще расстояния между ЦАП и УНЧ разные, у 5310 рядом у 5800 далеко.
Oh, and the distance between the DAC and VLF are different, the 5310 near the 5800 away.
И вот думаю,может ли эта небольшая разница в схемотехнике повлиять на разницу в звучании?
And I think, whether this small difference in the circuitry affected by the difference in sound?
Или все таки это разница программная?
Or are all the same software is the difference?
Useful to know, thanks for the link.
The specs measured by RMAA are not useful, you at least need a dScope until you can start seeing the sound quality of any smartphone.
...or, you can just look at similar devices which use the TPA6130, etc.