jamato8
Headphoneus Supremus
I would have to agree that from my experience it takes some voltage and unrestricted current to make the 627 swing. As always, it is in the implementation.
Originally Posted by Shopper /img/forum/go_quote.gif True. Btw, why hasn't anyone tried the OPA2365 or the OPA2727? They should be great for the I/V conversion after the DAC. |
Originally Posted by jamato8 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I would have to agree that from my experience it takes some voltage and unrestricted current to make the 627 swing. As always, it is in the implementation. |
Originally Posted by PPkiller /img/forum/go_quote.gif are you able to describe the differences between lt1364 and opa627bp? the samples i ordered should be on the way.. |
Originally Posted by musicmaker /img/forum/go_quote.gif So I've done a fair bit of listening with a bunch of opamps in the LR and buffer sections, with the line out of my iriver feeding the D1. I feel the amp section of the D1 feels pretty congested especially when dealing with complex sections of music (many instruments, voices etc). While opamp rolling has certainly made the amp section a lot better (especially with the Ad797), I still feel the amp section is still lacking (the airiness, separation, soundstage) ? I can quite put my finger on it but there is something about the amp section that really bothers me. Perhaps I'm just spoiled by my RSA XP-7. Now with the DAC its a different story, with the optical out of the iRiver music comes to life. The DAC's great but I'm disappointed with the amp. Is it just me or does anyone feel the same ? |
Originally Posted by cafe zeenuts /img/forum/go_quote.gif In my opinion the diferences is that the LT1364 is able to produce better snare drum sound better then OPA627BP it has more timbre, treble has a bit more detail more natural sound. And it has added a bit more airiness to the overall sound. |