Thanks all for the comments!
Quote:
How did you find the fit? I found the SR007 fit incredibly odd, the headband seemed to slip too far down the back of the head and there were gaps between the fronts of the pads and the face. It wasn't that it was uncomfortable per se... just a little off-putting and unusual.
The C32 looks to have a more traditional fork assembly and a normal stax headband assembly - has this made the fit better with those pads?
Personally, I have no problem with the fit of the 007A so it was easy to adjust to the C32. I tried to show it in the pictures: their ear pads seem to be about the same shape and size in the C32 except they don't rotate. I actually like that better because I don't see much a point to be able to rotate the pads (we all have a jaw as far as I know...).
The one thing that seems different with the new design is the foam may be softer so I think there is less chance of a gap like you mention.
While I am at it, I forgot to mention that I had to remove my glasses to get best bass, just like the 007A. So, you still need to make sure the fit is good with the C32...
Quote:
Quote:
Maybe STAX will suprise everyone and price this and its new tube amplifier as a 2000 dollar combo?
... Just kidding
Nice impressions though! If only I could afford it.
Yeah, right. What would be nice is a new statement amplifier from them though. I don't think they'll ever do another T2, but neither of their current top amps are really suited to the C32.
From discussion with a Stax representative at the Tokyo Fall headphone festival, there was a plan for releasing a new flagship amplifier to match the C32. However, he said it would come later on. My personal guess is no earlier than xmas 2011. Also, Stax might be using the 50th anniversary of the company for the naming of these new products.
Quote:
After reading this aritcal, will definitely get a C32 once it is released.
Saving up money....Probably have to pay over $6000 lol.
Stax said in 300-500kJPY range. Personal guess again: 400-450kJPY.
Quote:
I notice the C32 has a pinwheel-esque arrangement, like you'd find in the original SR-Omega. Do you have any experience with this headphone, arnaud? In some of the pictures the pinwheel looks odd, I'm not sure what I am seeing, is the mesh frame rounded off sooner than the "007A"?
PS I like that Emilianna track as well. Love in the Time of Science is still my preferred album though
I wish I had experience with the original Omega, but I don't, never even seen it in person... Sorry about that! I could not understand what you meant about the mesh frame. If you mean that open area of the frame seems larger in C32 than 007A, then definitely so.
Quote:
Thanks for the great review. Would you say it is more comfortable than the current O2 ( 007a) as far as how it feels on the ears?
I owned the current Omega 2s for 7 years and never got used to them.
The ear opening was too small and there was insufficient padding and it
always felt like it was something hard pressing my ears down.
I did like the you-are-there sound though.
Thanks again.
I do feel it is more comfortable than the current O2 as mentioned at the beginning. But it's quite similar fit, so if you don't like the O2, you may still have issues with this one.
Quote:
Natural an neutral aside, which do you think was most exciting/engaging to listen to, the C32 or the HD 800?
I did not compare the HD800 to the C32 directly, but below is a comparison between the HD800 (driven by Lehmann BCL) and the Omega 2 (driven by 727A). Original post is here: http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/223263/the-stax-thread-new/13200#post_6613053
Quote:
But this time, I realized how much Stax got it right... While the HD800 was sounding really excellent through the p1u, the Stax Omega was simply so much more natural / realistic / pleasant / attractive when fed by the SRM-727a amp. In particular, the 3D layer is so much more precise as well as total lack of graininess of the highs. The cymbals shimmer through the Omega 2 is no match for the HD800 when fed by the p1u, I was shocked.
At the end of the day, I actually placed an order for the SR-007a / SRM-727a setup, I am now joining club Stax after so many years of being a hardcore dynamic headphone guy, what a shock! For sure, I am keeping my HD800 and Lehman amplifier though. The Stax combo works best with Jazz / Classical / "soft" music but I am pretty sure I will want to listen to my HD800 at times I want punch over delicacy. As for my Edition 9, it may be time to go...
I have since sold both my HD800 and Edition 9 headphones, I am Stax junkie now... Suffice to say, I can't imagine preferring the HD800 to C32, anytime of the day, anyday...
Quote:
Thanks for the review. Comparisons are always the most informative ways of defining such products.
I have previously felt that the 007A has its weaknesses. There are both lower bass and mid treble peaks although these are less pronounced with the Spritzer spring mod. I have also been somewhat unhappy with the soundstage of the 007A
http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/476891/does-anyone-else-think-the-stax-007-has-a-constricted-soundstage and a number of people agreed with me on that score. Part of that problem came about I thought because of the size and shape of the chamber behind the drivers of the 007A. I was able to simulate both the somewhat boomy bass and the restricted soundstage of the 007A in a Lambda, by the simply matter of creating a similar chamber in the back of the Lambda case, using tape. I can't tell for sure from looking at the pictures but it looks like the overhanging lip of the 007A has been done away with and the driver looks closer to the outside grill. Both are factors that I would consider significant in improving the sound of this general type of headphone configuration.
If these new phones sound better even with the Stax 727A that may be good news, because that amp has not been too highly regarded here compared to the older 717. Possibly the new phones are easier to drive. Of course the test will be when it comes to the TOL amps like the BHSE and T2.
Thank you for linking back to that thread, it was and still is an excellent read! I think you make very good points and could very well be right about the influence of the O2 chamber on its sound signature. Spritzer mentioned the Stax earspeakers are dipole type transducers, but it does not prevent it from being significantly affected by the geometry / reflections of the rear chamber. And most likely, a partly covered back may yield a closed-in sound and possibly nasal colorations, although this is nowhere near as bad as many closed headphone designs.
In this thread you link, some proper vocabulary is used and I absolutely share the impressions of many: while the O2 does sound a bit closed in (what I meant by narrow soundstage), it's imaging (i.e. the accurate / pinpoint localization of instruments in the space) is as good as I have heard from headphone. I personally have no issue with the slight "closed in" / in your head feeling of the Omega 2 as I value depth of sound field / localization / room ambience more than wide soundstage. However, the C32 is clearly better than 007A at portraying a large soundstage, while being just as good if not better than 007A at imaging.
Quote:
Based on photos alone, I find the Omega 2 to be more attractive, but I understand that the C32 are still pre-production.
Is there any month planned for the release of these? I spoke to a few people who have had the pleasure of hearing it and have been told that it surpasses or equals the HE-90 (Orpheus) in a similar signature.
It's very exciting, but I really hope that Stax keeps the price lower than higher since more people will be able to own one.
See above comment for the price. Fujiya Avic staff (very friendly by the way as they let me monopolize their headphone rig for over an hour and a half!!) could not tell me anything about the price or release date. However, they are expecting it in the spring. That means as early as March! But could also be toward April May...