gimmeheadroom
Headphoneus Supremus
It's hard to tell what HQPlayer is capable of but it does win the award for the worst, most unusable UI of anything I've seen in a long, long time.
I think I'm one of the few people that uses DSD upsampling.
I would rather do it on PC. Assuming upsampling increase information, but it doesn't. It is helping Delta-Sigma users like Chord or some different brands, but only because it bypass inferior processing on a DAC, which also include extensive noise shaping.It's difficult to find anything higher than DSD64 (SACD) in mainstream recordings. There are a very few sites that sell upsampled DSD and maybe one that records in DSD128 or higher. So yeah, technically you could call a DDC that can only do PCM 384 / DXD and DSD512 a bottleneck. But that's only in theory, since there is basically no music to buy. And the way things are going, it's doubtful there will ever be any music at those rates.
I realize some people are upsampling, so as @sajunky suggested, let the DAC do it, not hqplayer...
I would rather do it on PC. Assuming upsampling increase information, but it doesn't. It is helping Delta-Sigma users like Chord or some different brands, but only because it bypass inferior processing on a DAC, which also include extensive noise shaping.
As Denafrips users are mostly R2R fans, such practice do not help. There are time settling limits for R2R ladder. When frequency increases, energy of switching glitches is increasing. Denafrips upsample internally everything to the maximum ladder frequency, some did measurements and found that Ares peaks the highest, upper models upsample to the lower frequency than Ares. Why it happen and why users have no control over upsampling?
Any one have any info on the OS (I guess it stands for oversampling) option on the Terminator?It's funny, I have files up to DSD 256, but since I got my Terminator 2 and Gaia Red Book 16/44 sounds so good I've stopped chasing hirez. I do go back and forth between upsampling 44 to 176 KHz, either in Foobar2000 or Jays CDT2 (not in the DAC), but that's all I need, today.
I would rather do it on PC. Assuming upsampling increase information, but it doesn't. It is helping Delta-Sigma users like Chord or some different brands, but only because it bypass inferior processing on a DAC, which also include extensive noise shaping.
As Denafrips users are mostly R2R fans, such practice do not help. There are time settling limits for R2R ladder. When frequency increases, energy of switching glitches is increasing. Denafrips upsample internally everything to the maximum ladder frequency, some did measurements and found that Ares peaks the highest, upper models upsample to the lower frequency than Ares. Why it happen and why users have no control over upsampling?
As I expressed it in my first reply, I wouldn't put presure on Denafrips to upgrade their DDC, but rather request to have control over internal upsampling rate in Denafrips DACs.
It's funny, I have files up to DSD 256, but since I got my Terminator 2 and Gaia Red Book 16/44 sounds so good I've stopped chasing hirez. I do go back and forth between upsampling 44 to 176 KHz, either in Foobar2000 or Jays CDT2 (not in the DAC), but that's all I need, today.
It works like that: upper model, better protection. Gaia features are only fully utilised with T+/TII. Pontus don't use it, so other brands are also matching well. DI-20 gives very good protection considering price. DI-20HE is one of the best DDC you can get.I have a new Pontus II and wonder which DDC would be the best match for it? Would the Gaia bring out the most or what should be the best match ?
It can't answer this question, but want to point out that with T+, Gaia is matching the best for a specific clock synchronisation feature. And it is worth to pair if you can afford such combination.Also would it be better to invest in the Terminator Plus instead of adding a DDC to the Pontus II ?
Thank you for responding. will dig into the DI-20.It works like that: upper model, better protection. Gaia features are only fully utilised with T+/TII. Pontus don't use it, so other brands are also matching well. DI-20 gives very good protection considering price. DI-20HE is one of the best DDC you can get.
It can't answer this question, but want to point out that with T+, Gaia is matching the best for a specific clock synchronisation feature. And it is worth to pair if you can afford such combination.
I am looking for some advice on which DDC to match with Pontus II?
I have a new Pontus II and wonder which DDC would be the best match for it? Would the Gaia bring out the most or what should be the best match ?
Also would it be better to invest in the Terminator Plus instead of adding a DDC to the Pontus II ?
I listed mostly to string quartet and soft jazz music.
I really appreciate any insights you have to offer.
Please let me know what you think.
I personally use a Hermes DDC with my P2 and i couldnt be happier. Not only the ddc cleans the signal and makes everything sound clear. it also acts as a hub for connecting multiple dacs. Right now, I have the P2 connected via I2s and a Yggy connected via AES. I still have room to add one more dac, and thats what i consider value for the money. The Gaia will clearly be superior to the Hermes but in order to yield such results, the rest of the chain needs to be upgraded as well.., IMO.I am looking for some advice on which DDC to match with Pontus II?
I have a new Pontus II and wonder which DDC would be the best match for it? Would the Gaia bring out the most or what should be the best match ?
Also would it be better to invest in the Terminator Plus instead of adding a DDC to the Pontus II ?
I listed mostly to string quartet and soft jazz music.
I really appreciate any insights you have to offer.
Please let me know what you think.
Pontus has no galvanic isolation on USB port, neither Venus, only T+/II has. These models will benefit the most from DDC, as all (I know) have USB port isolated. This is the most important function of DDC - not reclocking (in a case of asynchronous transfers reclocking doesn't make any sense), but protection from noise.Not to muddy the waters, but I agree with CAJames that you should invest in a better DAC, rather than buy a DAC/DDC combo.
The DDC is nice as a digital hub, but I presume you're interested in it more for its potential sonic benefits. However, consider that if your DAC is galvanically isolated and uses an oven-controlled clock...