New candidate for 'ugly phones' distinction?
Aug 16, 2007 at 5:45 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 26

Disiskurt

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Posts
587
Likes
0
http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.3727

Dear God...

sku_3727_1.jpg
 
Aug 16, 2007 at 6:06 AM Post #5 of 26
i dunno man, when i saw the jecklin floats, i didnt even think they were real because they were so ridiculous.

TheFamousJecklinFloatPicture.jpg
 
Aug 16, 2007 at 6:34 AM Post #6 of 26
Oh no, I don't mean to suggest that they'd compete for top honors like the Floats. But it is a particularly ugly, stupid looking set of headphones.
 
Aug 17, 2007 at 2:48 AM Post #8 of 26
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris_Himself /img/forum/go_quote.gif
i dunno man, when i saw the jecklin floats, i didnt even think they were real because they were so ridiculous.

TheFamousJecklinFloatPicture.jpg



Oh man,this picture is a masterpiece.Can't decide what is worst:the Floats or the shirt
biggrin.gif
 
Aug 17, 2007 at 10:39 PM Post #12 of 26
It doesn't matter who's doing the picture, it's still funny. That said, if you're looking for cheap wireless headphones these would be the ticket. You could paint them and do a KSC driver transplant if they were that bad. It would still be cheap wireless.
 
Aug 17, 2007 at 10:40 PM Post #13 of 26
JecklinRecreation.JPG
 
Aug 17, 2007 at 10:42 PM Post #15 of 26
Quote:

Originally Posted by cling /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Can someone tell me the weight of Floats??? Bahaha


Dude they are called floats for a reason, they are weightless.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top