chaza01
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Posts
- 18
- Likes
- 10
This was my suspicion - great, saves me money!
Thank you
Thank you
The HP50 doesn't need an amp. With an amp it will improve the sound a little, but not a lot. It was designed to work when played out of mobile phones...
Precisely. Not only is HP50 engineered to be efficient to be played back from mobile devices, several reliable sources (as my memory serves correctly) noted that the sound quality will stay fairly consistent regardless of amp.
Naturally however, better quality source of amp (dedicated amp vs onboard notebook amp) will provide less distortion. Therefore, greatest difference will be presented through the source material of the music (lossless files) and DAC.
This is so true. Tried pairing the HP50's with my crappy old phone, and its sound is still superb. Too bad it would scale minimally though.
I found using a better source had a bigger impact on quality than the actual amp.
Compared to headphones like the HD650, the HP50 does not scale up too much. Best I heard is with the AK240 but I'm going to listen to my HP50 out of the Chord Hugo next month (probably will buy the Hugo too). The sonic signature does not change too much but the sound becomes more dynamic and a much bigger 360 degrees soundstage can be heard. It's impressive though that the basic sound signature does not change so much even when you compare the $250 DX50 with the $2500 AK240. Looking forward to pairing with the Hugo!
Is that a good characteristic? I think it is. That means other HPs (that has scaleability) aren't at their best with portables.
Hi all, I have NAD hp50s (great headphones) - quick question: I haven't yet bought an amp, do you think an amp makes much of a difference all do these not need them?
Many thanks