jcx
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2002
- Posts
- 2,371
- Likes
- 371
Beyer's comments are suspect - probably marketing not understanding the tech
for the same motor structure - same mag field, same voice coil dimensions - you are "free" to design to "any" impedance you want by using the same weight of copper - trading of turns count against wire size - within the limits of practical wire size, some "2nd order" limitations of fill factor/insulation thickness tradeoffs
the effect is like having a "ideal transformer" built in - the electro-mechanical driver properties are identical except for the terminal impedance scaling factor - the the electro-acoustic response should be the same as well
for Beyer to claim that the same model # with different impedance has different "speed" means they didn't follow this well known motor design principle and deliberately designed in different responses
or the marketing guys just couldn't refrain from making something up
for the same motor structure - same mag field, same voice coil dimensions - you are "free" to design to "any" impedance you want by using the same weight of copper - trading of turns count against wire size - within the limits of practical wire size, some "2nd order" limitations of fill factor/insulation thickness tradeoffs
the effect is like having a "ideal transformer" built in - the electro-mechanical driver properties are identical except for the terminal impedance scaling factor - the the electro-acoustic response should be the same as well
for Beyer to claim that the same model # with different impedance has different "speed" means they didn't follow this well known motor design principle and deliberately designed in different responses
or the marketing guys just couldn't refrain from making something up