Tuberoller
Divorced an Orpheus to keep his wife.
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2001
- Posts
- 4,941
- Likes
- 15
Easily evident but still not idiot proof. This coming from an idiot
Originally Posted by Tuberoller Easily evident but still not .... |
Originally Posted by Oink1 Chalk up 1 to pilot error! ![]() ![]() |
Originally Posted by Tuberoller Easily evident but still not idiot proof. |
Originally Posted by KenW LOL! Haven't we all been there at one time or another?! ![]() |
Originally Posted by PhilS It would seem to me that generally the better practice before posting a thread that says "My [name of specific product] failed," is to contact the manufacturer and see what the problem is first, especially when it is one of the folks like Ray Samuels, Mikhail, etc. Otherwise, the "headline" exlaiming that the product "failed," stays and only if you read through the posts do you realize it is "operator error" (in this case.) It's sort of like the retraction is on page 5, and people may not read it. I have nothing to do with Ray Samuels by the way and don't own any of his products, but I just think the instinct to imediately post that something is not working is not always the best instinct. ![]() |
Originally Posted by PhilS It would seem to me that generally the better practice before posting a thread that says "My [name of specific product] failed," is to contact the manufacturer and see what the problem is first, especially when it is one of the folks like Ray Samuels, Mikhail, etc. Otherwise, the "headline" exlaiming that the product "failed," stays and only if you read through the posts do you realize it is "operator error" (in this case.) It's sort of like the retraction is on page 5, and people may not read it. I have nothing to do with Ray Samuels by the way and don't own any of his products, but I just think the instinct to imediately post that something is not working is not always the best instinct. ![]() |