nipit
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Posts
- 671
- Likes
- 20
Quote:
200$ IEM shouldn't be considered budget.
Upper class 'budget' IEM.![]()
200$ IEM shouldn't be considered budget.
Upper class 'budget' IEM.![]()
But...what if...I have a budget of $170?![]()
The point of the thread was to show the "value" of each IEM at their respective price range not review only "cheap" IEMs but I guess it did started off that way.
What do you guys think though - change title, sort by price range, and/or both?
maybe the common term "bang for buck" is more fitting!
In my opinion, you should maybe think about adding a point-based system like joker. Seeing as these reviews are mostly centered around the cheaper in-ears,
it's simpler for someone starting out to pick out an earphone based on a few numbers rather than having to read every single review and try to figure out the
vocabulary. Anyways great job!
maybe the common term "bang for buck" is more fitting!
In my opinion, you should maybe think about adding a point-based system like joker. Seeing as these reviews are mostly centered around the cheaper in-ears,
it's simpler for someone starting out to pick out an earphone based on a few numbers rather than having to read every single review and try to figure out the
vocabulary. Anyways great job!
Yeah bang for buck or value for money is a better term to use I think. You could even do a graphics card inspired weighted score, instead of FPS per $ you could do SQ per $ or something of the like....just an idea. MP8320 FTW![]()