But it does affect if you put them in a wrong context, like you are writhing S/N 127dba are good but not the best and so on..
But it is not a S/N figure you are reading in the spec. It is a DR value . ( Dynamic Range)
Thats why everyone think it is not so good, so i will ask Rob to tell Chord to edit the info spec of DAVE because you are not alone to get miss led by the unusual spec data the have published, it is better to take the same measuring specs like all other companies are using, it is easier to compare it then if someone like to spend their time to do that.
Well I am glad this has been mentioned, as DR could be even more significant. It is directly related to the effective number of bits, which is effective resolution. From the published figure what we could tell is that the Chord Dave cannot really match the resolution of the MSB Analog, which is 133dB, this being the entry level MSB DAC. Can the Dave sound very nice, rich and exciting? Sure, entirely possible. I just doubt its ability of pulling a rabbit out of the hat, that's all.
127dB is a bit better than the measured Yggdrasil DAC. Also the Dave does cost considerably more, but it includes some headamp option. It could be a good product no doubt.