MrSpeakersPeter
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2013
- Posts
- 173
- Likes
- 173
We won't be starting on the upgrades for another week or two. We are still waiting on people to ship them to us so we can start on them all at the same time.
I'd still like to know how the C Flow compares to C 1.1 in frequency response. More bass thats been established. Less treble? how much so? like is it neutral or warm tuning, better treble extension?
We won't be starting on the upgrades for another week or two. We are still waiting on people to ship them to us so we can start on them all at the same time.
What didn’t you like about the Elears? TBH I didn’t care for them to much when I tried them at a meet but then again I also didn’t really care for the HD650…
I would like to comment on the "less treble" notion. The C Flow has a smoother treble that creates a more balanced presentation. by reducing peaks it will appear less bright if you cue off the loudest peak but if you cue off the whole instrument you will hear more treble. On the whole there is more treble in the Flow, with more resolution But the improved balance definitely makes it sound less hot. IMHO this gives a more lively high end while reducing fatigue and increasing the "natural" factor. Listen to great jazz recordings and it is pretty obvious....
My review is up over at AudioHead. I talk a bit about the differences in the treble. In short, the headphone doesn't feel as bright but I don't believe there is less treble or detail. The FR balance feels much more natural as a result. Basically, I agree with what Dan said.
I've been reading comments about burn in. Do you have a recommended burn in time for the Flows, or do you not substantiate a difference in sq with extended playing time? Thanks!
My review is up over at AudioHead. I talk a bit about the differences in the treble. In short, the headphone doesn't feel as bright but I don't believe there is less treble or detail. The FR balance feels much more natural as a result. Basically, I agree with what Dan said.
My review is up over at AudioHead. I talk a bit about the differences in the treble. In short, the headphone doesn't feel as bright but I don't believe there is less treble or detail. The FR balance feels much more natural as a result. Basically, I agree with what Dan said.
My review is up over at AudioHead. I talk a bit about the differences in the treble. In short, the headphone doesn't feel as bright but I don't believe there is less treble or detail. The FR balance feels much more natural as a result. Basically, I agree with what Dan said.
My review is up over at AudioHead. I talk a bit about the differences in the treble. In short, the headphone doesn't feel as bright but I don't believe there is less treble or detail. The FR balance feels much more natural as a result. Basically, I agree with what Dan said.
Good review. Can you comment on how it sounds compared to either of the new Focals?
We won't be starting on the upgrades for another week or two. We are still waiting on people to ship them to us so we can start on them all at the same time.
Even the FR seems to be in between the two, with a more balanced sound than the Elear but a darker sound than the Utopia.
I will say that if I were to pick a price for the ECF based on the prices and performance of the Focals, I'd place it closer to the Utopia than it's currently priced. The ECF is a great value when compared to those two... or most any headphone in the $1k+ range.
Puzzling. I signed up, but have not been contacted.
Are you doing upgrades in select groups?