bigshot
Headphoneus Supremus
It isn't the same as a Flac. It's lossy.
what is lossy? FLAC is Free Lossless Audio Codec . Lossy=FlacIt isn't the same as a Flac. It's lossy.
ok helped. here.thanks. but tidal not unfolding me first time mqa. im listen music with my dac mqa renderer only 8x. how activate tidal to unfold 2x first time?Lossless means that when a compressed file unpacks, it is exactly the same as it was before it was compressed.
Lossy means that when a compressed file unpacks, it may sound as good to human ears, but some information was altered.
MQA is not lossless. It attempts to shift super audible frequencies down into the audible range to allow the file to compress down small enough to stream. On playback it decodes those frequencies and puts them back in the super audible range, but the byproduct of that is added noise.
Essentially MQA reduces fidelity to preserve frequencies we can't even hear. It sounds OK I guess, but it isn't any better than a regular old CD to human ears, in fact, it's a little worse when it comes to noise. And lossy codecs like AAC and MP3 at high data rates will sound just as good as anything.
People with low literacy skills may struggle interpreting this. A better way to say the same thing without confusion would be:It isn't the same as a Flac. It's lossy.
Yes. It is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist in order to sell snake oil to gullible audiophools.MQA is reduced fidelity, even compared to CD quality sound.
Of course the process introduces noise/distortion, because the whole idea of encoding inaudible ultrasonic frequencies together with audible frequencies is crazy. NTSC and PAL television standards (remember the old times?) mixed modulated colour information with the high frequency black and white picture information that caused colour-modulated interferences to the picture, but the trickery was at least well justified, because adding colour to the tv picture was a big deal and the method had to be backward compatible for those watching colour transmissions on B&W television sets.There's another thread where a guy did some testing and found that the process introduces noise.
exlusive ,master format far better sounding on high end headphones. if use cheap 100-250eur headphones then no difference.You don't really need MQA at all. Just use the regular Tidal streaming format.
regular Tidal streaming is 24bit/44.1khz master MQA has 24/96khz.It has nothing to do with the quality of the headphones. MQA as a format offers nothing that improves sound that humans can hear, and all it does is add noise from error in unpacking the inaudible sound it compresses.
Frequencies above 20kHz are inaudible and add nothing to how good music sounds. The quality of sound depends on the mastering, not the digital format. The primary purpose of MQA is to create a proprietary format so they can charge you more for it.
16/44.1 is perfect and very nice. but 24/88.2 or 24/192 is far better and more details .16/44.1 is perfect sound for human ears. See the link in my sig called CD Sound Is All You Need.
MQA isn't an improvement over 16/44.1.
Agreed, because it covers the full range of human hearing.16/44.1 is perfect and very nice.
How can anything be better than perfect? You’re contradicting yourself!but 24/88.2 or 24/192 is far better and more details .
no man, 24/96 is better sounding and human hear it,and 24/192 is hearing too with lots details.Agreed, because it covers the full range of human hearing.
How can anything be better than perfect? You’re contradicting yourself!
G