Ideal
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Posts
- 6
- Likes
- 0
Quote:
You couldn't be more wrong!
The 6N11's/6922's do a lot for the sound image, I won't say what I've replaced mine with but I can tell you this, it sure isn't Sylvania.
I like open and dimensional sound, Sylvania and RCA have a closed boxy claustrophobic type sound.
As for the 6N3J, I use the stock one, as I have been unable to find a suitable replacement. You just balance it out by choosing other E88CC/6922/6N11's.
When I tried LM Ericsson 396A instead of 6N3J all I got was buzz, just like you experienced.
I think the 6N3J may be "primed" at it's max operating limit, and that probably exceeds 396A/5670.
Originally Posted by Agnostic /img/forum/go_quote.gif I tried replacing the 6N3 with a russian 6N3P-EV(EB) but they increased the buzz and didn't improve the sound. Also tried replacing the 6n11's with two Sylvania JAN 6DJ8 but one channel was much louder than the other. Anyway they didn't seem to have a very big effect on the sound signature. .... The Russian 6n23p-eb(ev) is supposed to be a good replacement for the 6n11 I read but my experience with the Sylvania 6DJ8 made me feel sound quality would not improve greatly from replacing the 6n11's. |
You couldn't be more wrong!
The 6N11's/6922's do a lot for the sound image, I won't say what I've replaced mine with but I can tell you this, it sure isn't Sylvania.
I like open and dimensional sound, Sylvania and RCA have a closed boxy claustrophobic type sound.
As for the 6N3J, I use the stock one, as I have been unable to find a suitable replacement. You just balance it out by choosing other E88CC/6922/6N11's.
When I tried LM Ericsson 396A instead of 6N3J all I got was buzz, just like you experienced.
I think the 6N3J may be "primed" at it's max operating limit, and that probably exceeds 396A/5670.