Modifying the Xiang Sheng 708B [56K!!!!]
Jun 14, 2008 at 3:46 AM Post #166 of 223
Quote:

Originally Posted by nikongod /img/forum/go_quote.gif
REALLY weird, mine has a 50k ohm pot.

anyways, you measure from the input of the RCA to the input on the amp board.

As always observe HV safety.

With the volume set to min, it should read 100k.

If you set the knob to the middle of its travel it should be more than 70k for a 100k-ohm AUDIO pot. If it is 50k, its linear.

Linear pots also have a very non-linear volume scale. They only offer a few degrees of usefull range, with the rest offering little increase in volume for lots of spin...

This just means that when I have money again I have to get one of the Chinese steppers. maybe i can rig a shunt in the mean-time (yuck)

edited/added:
I added a 7.5k ohm shunt resistor between the output and ground. Its better than it was, but still leaves a little to be desired. Its just a band-aid until I can get some cash for a Chinese stepper.



why not just get an alps black beauty?
 
Jun 14, 2008 at 5:12 AM Post #167 of 223
Quote:

Originally Posted by Random Murderer /img/forum/go_quote.gif
why not just get an alps black beauty?


from where?

familygate only has linear rk40's. Michael Percy has audio RK40's but only mono, and by the time he responds to my first email, i could have had mikhail do it
wink.gif


I may just use a blue velvet. Im on the fence regarding whether I want better channel balance, or more precise control. I suppose the superior channel balance of a stepper could be negated by a flaw in one of my tubes, and an amp with this much gain does better with more control at the lower volume levels.
 
Jun 14, 2008 at 8:34 AM Post #168 of 223
I just dug up my original stock pot from the parts bin and it's also labeled as B100K and measures at ~100kΩ. At the halfway point it measures ~50kΩ so it is indeed linear.
 
Jun 14, 2008 at 1:04 PM Post #169 of 223
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrhill /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Hello All,
In Oz, we have 240v, 50Hz and this gives high volts (B+) of +215 on pcb, heaters of 7.3v ac, and the current thru the input valve (6N3, etc) is about 2.7mA, and 10.5 mA thru the 6N11s.
... jh



Hi folks,

It's a long time since I posted about my mods on here... Not had chance to do anything else with my amp since.

I just bought a 500VA autotransformer with 240V and 220V taps. Nominally the voltage in our house (UK) is 237V@50Hz, and usually between 231..243V when I check it, depending on the load in our house and time of year.
500VA is probably overkill, but I've got a couple of other 220V things I can run on it too. Check out Electronic components distributor. Electronic equipment and electrical products from Rapid part 88-1926.

The output of the autotransformer was bob on 220V with a 239V input this morning.

I'm going to take out the heater series resistors that I added for 240V operation, and have a quick play around with the HT power resistors to see how it runs on 220V. If it is ok, using the autotransformer is a load easier than messing around with some of the mods I did before!
tongue.gif
Also didn't like the idea of 240V feeding the transformer rated at 220V for long periods of time.

Will post an update if I ever get around to finishing the experiment!
wink.gif



Best wishes,
CC.
 
Jun 16, 2008 at 2:46 AM Post #170 of 223
Quote:

Originally Posted by dcheming /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I just dug up my original stock pot from the parts bin and it's also labeled as B100K and measures at ~100kΩ. At the halfway point it measures ~50kΩ so it is indeed linear.


well then, looks like my first mod(other than possible tube rolling or a 6x4 mod) will be to fit a new pot. the blue velvet looks like a winner 'til i can find someone that sells a black beauty or an elks pot for a decent price...
 
Jun 17, 2008 at 3:50 AM Post #171 of 223
today i made a trip to ace hardware(it's maybe a 1/2 KM from here)because i needed a brick. yes, one single brick. while i was there i picked up the same toggle switch that derek used and installed it. i also got some nylon standoffs for the transformer, but i'm not doing that mod just yet.
in order to install the switch, all i did was de-solder the existing push-switch from the pcb and the wires as well and then connected the wires to the new switch. i didn't need to cut the pcb to make any room or anything...
and while i was tinkering inside the amp, i noticed that this amp had been tube rolled by the previous owner. in it are 2 RCA-Holland 6DJ8 tubes and a GE-JAN 5670.
i'm hoping to get a 6x4 soon, most likely the westinghouse because of it's size, and also some matsu****a 6922's.
EDIT: and all these thoughts of tube-rolling come after breaking in these tubes for ~100 hours. they do sound great(though anything would, coming from a cmoy!), maybe i'll hold off...
 
Jun 18, 2008 at 8:31 PM Post #172 of 223
So today i did a bit of resistor work. I added one 2w 511k resistor in parallel with each filter cap as bleeders and replaced the 10Ω headphone output resistors with a pair of hand-matched(by me) 1% 10Ω Claro resistors.
I had also bought 3 2MΩ resistors(for a total of 1 2MΩ and one 1MΩ for the power supply) only to find that most of the resistance and capacitance values in my amp are different than all of yours...

while in there, i also removed all of those little spring things that were holding the tubes down and the jumpers that held the springs to the boards. i think it looks better this way, and the tubes definitely didn't need those springs to stay in place... oh, and i replaced the jumper in the right channel path with a lead from one of the resistors i used...
EDIT: just added the standoffs to the power supply, i don't know if it's affecting temperatures or not, but it definitely looks a heck of a lot better.
 
Jun 23, 2008 at 9:41 PM Post #173 of 223
alright, i ended up disconnecting the leads from the window tube so it just sits there with the led's shining on it...
today, i received my vintage(~1950) westinghouse-USA 6x4. it's actually a bit taller than the stock tube, and even though i lowered the power supply pcb as low as it will go without touching the case, i still can't put the cover back on...
suggestions?
 
Jul 12, 2008 at 4:59 AM Post #174 of 223
Quote:

Originally Posted by regal /img/forum/go_quote.gif
If you replaced all those resistors why not make it an Optimized Morgan Jones Amplifier so it can work with low impedance cans ?


on a scale of 0 to 15, with 15 being much more than 0, you are 92/7

the stock 708B does well for low impedance headphones, but why not change it to a really solid design when its guts are all out....

I posted about the volume knob thing. In an effort to save my thinning wallet, I have not yet replaced the rigged solution. im not even sure that i will. that would put me over budget.

I changed the cathode resistor value on the input tube to drop the plate voltage into the range necessary for the output stage. I bypassed this resistor with an electrolytic cap, as described in the headwize article.

I copied the output stage from the optimized MJ article at headwize as closely as my resistors of choice would allow. (rn65 vishay, which are too large. paralleling 2 rn60 gives a better fit....)

I increased the output caps from 200uf/150V (i think, im not digging in the garbage...) to 330uf/250V because of the output stage, there is still ample basssss.

I changed the 2K ohm resistor on the power supply board to a 1.8K to get the B+ voltage a LITTLE higher. i should have gotten 1.6K, its still only hitting 210V.

I will post photos later, im crunked and its late.

edited:
Its now early in the morning, and I took some pictures.
I am no longer feeling the effects of the alcohol, but my camera always is...

im000353rgc6.jpg


im000348roz6.jpg


im000345rko7.jpg
 
Jul 30, 2008 at 2:37 AM Post #175 of 223
I added adjustable feedback the other week.

This evening I replaced the resistor/cap on the cathode of the input/gain triode with a single RED LED.

Led cathode bias makes me hard in the pants.

im000355rle4.jpg
 
Jul 30, 2008 at 3:42 AM Post #176 of 223
Quote:

Originally Posted by nikongod /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I added adjustable feedback the other week.

This evening I replaced the resistor/cap on the cathode of the input/gain triode with a single RED LED.

Led cathode bias makes me hard in the pants.

im000355rle4.jpg



what does the led add or subtract in terms of the sound, rather than the caps/resistors?
 
Jul 30, 2008 at 3:46 PM Post #177 of 223
The LED on the cathode of the triode rather than the resistor & cap helps to achieve the theoretical ideal of Rk=0ohms across a wider frequency range. This is good because the bass performance will NEVER suffer with this setup, and distortions in general decrease.

Scope jockeys will put on a smile 2 miles wide when a $0.01 LED (yes, one American penny when bought in bulk) in that spot outperforms a resistor/cap pair many times more expensive. This is not to say the sound is inherently better, there are a bunch of people who prefer the sound of a resistor/cap.

I have seen some posts by people who don’t like the sound of an LED with such little DC current going through it. Its about 2.6mA with a red LED. The recommendation I saw was “run the LED at rated current or don’t run one.” I think it’s a littttle extreme, but we all have our sonic preferences.

The first thing I noticed with this was the very good bass detail. Im not sure that the advantages to the midrange and topend are particularly large, and with the general distortion of the amp being so calm and nice anyways its a change from “a small but pleasant error” to “a smaller and still pleasant error.”
 
Jul 31, 2008 at 5:25 AM Post #178 of 223
I finally ordered a replacement for the stock 6N3 I've been running this whole time. Nothing fancy for now, merely a JAN-5670W. I've been putting this off for so long I just wanted to get something, anything.

I also ended up rewiring the entire amp a while back with 20 and 18 awg PVC Neotech UP-OCC Mono-Crystal wire. This came about after a friend and I did a comparison between one of my Belden CAT6 IC's, my Belden 9258 co-ax, and a Belden Teflon co-ax IC. I didn't realize how much the CAT6 was getting in the way of the upper frequencies and air. It was slightly muddy compared to the two co-ax cables. So that motivated me to change it all out for something else (and to also order a 5670). To be honest the change wasn't as big as I was expecting, but the sound is a bit more natural so it was worth the trouble.

dsc01457pv3.jpg



BTW, all the extra slack in the gray braid is to allow for future changes in output caps.
 
Jul 31, 2008 at 9:09 PM Post #179 of 223
wow that's some good-looking wiring, do you have any thoughs as to what you might put in to replace your exisiting caps
 
Aug 3, 2008 at 5:31 PM Post #180 of 223
Quote:

Originally Posted by NoPants /img/forum/go_quote.gif
wow that's some good-looking wiring, do you have any thoughs as to what you might put in to replace your exisiting caps


Thanks, since I have higher impedance cans I was thinking about just going with a pair of 47uF Mundorf M-Caps. Not sure if I actually will though since I'm going to build a Stacker II Hybrid as soon as boards are readily available and I'd like to get all nice parts for it instead of doing more things to my XS.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top