To me the Empyrean is the headphone that finally meets all my needs. Bass, resolution, detail, timbre, 3D space, tonal accuracy, comfort.
I am glad to see the review community is also generally extremely impressed by these headphones.
For these reasons it strikes me even more if I come across a very negative opinion.
Not long ago for example someone shared his thoughts on the Empyrean: "under-performing for its price, mess in tone and frequency response, bass is less clean than LCD2C, Verum1 has better tonality'.
I couldn't disagree more and almost shocked at a response like this. Can we really hear this differently? What is going on here?
And as he states he used some acceptable gear apparently. (Yggy, Gumby, Ragnarok, WA6SE...)
To be fair I always found his comments even on other headphones weird and disagreed in a strong way I hardly ever do. But still, I am left puzzled by these comments on the Empy.
Not that I care much, I am one of the happiest Empy owners, but can someone explain how another human being is able to prefer Verum1 and LCD2C (both are phenomenal headphones for the price!) and value them much higher than the Empy?
Is it something to do with hearing or I am just malicious to think this?
Edit: Another strange thing about this dude is that he keeps listing headphones like the LCD4, Utopia and others in his signature which he admittedly sold months ago (but he said he didn't have the time to update his signature) as he preferred cheaper options like the HD650, Verum and LCD2C.
I do think the LCD2C is the best option out there under £1000 if someone likes bass, but come on man...