KR...
Curator of the Headphone Lust Museum
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2001
- Posts
- 9,534
- Likes
- 31
I am reviewing here JMT made META42 amp. This was made for Bootman. I will let JMT and Bootman list the parts used in making this amp. For the amp’s looks, I will direct you to the PICS that Bootman posted. The amp has a blue LED which looks really sweet when it’s on, I like much better than the standard red one. Other than that and the fancy headphone jack the amp looks very plain and understated, which may or may not be a good thing depending on your own personal taste. It should be noted that the batteries on the META do not last anywhere near as long as the batteries on the RA-1. The most important thing however is the sound, I will be comparing this to my own Grado RA-1 amp.
Directly comparing the two amps, the highs were more extended and detailed on the META then the RA-1. I really love the highs on the META, and I think that it is the true star of the show with this amp, I will go as far as to say that this amp has some of the best highs of ANY headphone amp that I have heard, and I have heard just about all of them. The highs on the RA-1 are however very sweet and natural and very non-fatiguing, but you give up something as a result. But, don’t miss understand, the META is not bright, it’s not splashy at all. The Bass of the META also seems to go much deeper than the RA-1, however the bass on the RA-1 is little faster, tighter, and more detailed then of the META. The bass on the META however is much more powerful, again this may or may not be a good thing depending on ones taste. The midrange on the META tend to be a bit on the warm side, while the midrange on the RA-1 sounds much more neutral. Overall, the RA-1 is more transparent and neutral then the META. The META however does extract more detail from your CDs than the RA-1, but it is colored, unlike the RA-1. Color doesn’t have to be a bad thing, as many people are disappointed if their amp doesn’t add to the sound, which is why many people may not like the RA-1 or the Blockhead, and love tube amps. So in the end, it’s up to your own personal taste to dictate which approach you prefer.
Equipment Used:
Headphones :
Grado HP-2
Sennheiser HD-600
AKG 501
Cables :
MIT MI-330 CVTerminator Series Two
Clou 212 Red Jaspis Headphone Cable
Amps :
Meta42
Grado RA-1
Source :
Cambridge DVD Player
Directly comparing the two amps, the highs were more extended and detailed on the META then the RA-1. I really love the highs on the META, and I think that it is the true star of the show with this amp, I will go as far as to say that this amp has some of the best highs of ANY headphone amp that I have heard, and I have heard just about all of them. The highs on the RA-1 are however very sweet and natural and very non-fatiguing, but you give up something as a result. But, don’t miss understand, the META is not bright, it’s not splashy at all. The Bass of the META also seems to go much deeper than the RA-1, however the bass on the RA-1 is little faster, tighter, and more detailed then of the META. The bass on the META however is much more powerful, again this may or may not be a good thing depending on ones taste. The midrange on the META tend to be a bit on the warm side, while the midrange on the RA-1 sounds much more neutral. Overall, the RA-1 is more transparent and neutral then the META. The META however does extract more detail from your CDs than the RA-1, but it is colored, unlike the RA-1. Color doesn’t have to be a bad thing, as many people are disappointed if their amp doesn’t add to the sound, which is why many people may not like the RA-1 or the Blockhead, and love tube amps. So in the end, it’s up to your own personal taste to dictate which approach you prefer.
Equipment Used:
Headphones :
Grado HP-2
Sennheiser HD-600
AKG 501
Cables :
MIT MI-330 CVTerminator Series Two
Clou 212 Red Jaspis Headphone Cable
Amps :
Meta42
Grado RA-1
Source :
Cambridge DVD Player