castleofargh
Sound Science Forum Moderator
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2011
- Posts
- 11,035
- Likes
- 6,924
Don't want to base everything on old news, but over the years I got the idea that Hifiman was among the worst in term on driver consistency. So maybe they needed to get rid of that issue so much that they have started to pay extra attention? In any case, 0.1dB is a pipe dream. If they actually said it, it's probably a lie.
But with IEMs like in OP's case, it usually comes down to keeping the insertion identical, and trying to minimize the variations from how the tips get in the "canal". 2 issues that a listener will also encounter, like headphone positioning.
THD is irrelevant for a FR sweep. The main difficulty for me is to place the 2 drivers exactly the same way on the dummy head. And in most cases, we'll measure headphones with one mic on each side, so the apparatus also needs impeccable matching it rarely has.But on average they are pretty well matched, I would say below 1 dB for most of the frequency range shown. It is extremely hard to impossible to have perfectly matched drivers just because of the physics involved. Also, remember that measurements have resolution limits (this rig had a limitation with THD, It cannot measure below 0.02%).
But with IEMs like in OP's case, it usually comes down to keeping the insertion identical, and trying to minimize the variations from how the tips get in the "canal". 2 issues that a listener will also encounter, like headphone positioning.