Matched transistors in Dynahi
Oct 16, 2006 at 2:29 PM Post #121 of 158
Well, here's what I wound up with for the drive transistors:

Group 1
2SA1358Y: 148, 148, 150, 153; spread 5, average 149.75
2SC3421Y: 148, 148, 148, 149; spread 1, average 148.25

Group 2
2SA1358O: 128, 129, 129, 131: spread 3, average 129.25
2SC3421Y: 128, 130, 132, 133: spread 5, average 130.75

It's not perfect, but pretty good. Started with 20 of each.
 
Nov 12, 2006 at 5:10 PM Post #122 of 158
Im building KGSS... For input stage instead of 2SK389(since they aren't available anymore) I have bought 30 pcs of 2SK170 for matching (on the right). Idss looks ok, but transistors themselves look a bit weired comparing to the ones on the left(I have 4 of those).
Idss(at 9 volt) looks like this:
for left transistors:
6,22 (mA)
6,26
6,92
9,95
And those on the right:
6,65
6,8
6,82
6,85
6,93
7
7,13
7,18
7,49
7,5
7,56
7,63
7,64
7,7
7,74
7,84
7,93
8,13
8,13
8,81
9,15
9,34
9,4
9,45
9,53
9,63
10,25
10,25
10,43
10,73

Looks ok, but I'am still concerned about them. Did anyone see 2SK170 like those on the right? All pics of s170 i could find on inet look like left ones. Hope those aren't fakes... :frowning2:

 
Nov 17, 2006 at 6:55 AM Post #125 of 158
http://www.diamondstar.de/dDB_partslist.html

Quote:

[size=small]Note 3: hFE matching of BJT transistors[/size]
Transistor matching is not a necessity, most probably it doesn't make an audible and just a measurable difference
Since we are using bipolar junction transistors (BJT) matching is done by their hFE values.
Matching is done within a single channel only, you don't have to match the channels
Match input stage Q6 / Q7 (good chances of success)
Match current mirror Q2 / Q4 / Q3 / Q5 (medium chances of success)
Match output stage Q8a/b / Q9a/b (poor chances of success, little benefit)
The small signal transistors used in the input stage and the ccs mirror (2n50xx ... BC5xx) are cheap (~ 5 cent ea.), get about 30 to 50 of each to find decent complementary pairs among them.
For the large transistors used in the output stage it's unlikely to get perfect matching pairs, probably npn and pnp types are more or less off each other. Don't get frustrated if the ranges not even overlap, group them as good as possible but don't buy too many surplus.
The easiest way matching transistors is to measure their hFE values with a DMM that has a transistor socket and supports this mode. There is a nice transistor matching thread at head-fi.org and a page about BJT transistor matching on my site if you want to read more about this topic.


 
Nov 17, 2006 at 1:30 PM Post #126 of 158
Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterX /img/forum/go_quote.gif
http://www.diamondstar.de/dDB_partslist.html


MisterX:

I don't why that verbiage isn't clear to me
wink.gif
So, I want Q2 = Q4 = Q3 = Q5?
 
Nov 28, 2006 at 3:46 PM Post #128 of 158
I've been preparing for the upcoming set of amps that use the 2sj74 and 2sk170 by trying to match up for Idss and have run into a bit of a problem. I ordered 2sj74-BL from B&D and a mixed assortment of 2sk170 from Futurlec which turned out to be mainly BL with some GR. The 2sj74 tested just fine within their listed range (6-12 mA,) but the ~50 2sk170-BL I got from Futurlec are way out of spec, in the range of 15-16 mA. This is near the center of the V range!
blink.gif
I'm trying to figure out what's going on here. I know that these JFETs have a reputation for being off spec, but this seems ridiculous. Is it possible I got re-marked or defective parts, or is this par for the course for these devices?
 
Nov 28, 2006 at 5:12 PM Post #130 of 158
Yeah, I'm pretty sure the polarities are right. I'm a little loath to send them back as my order did not specify gain class; I'd be in the same position with no ability to complain if these parts were properly labeled as V grade. My big worry is that I got another brand of JFET relabeled as 2sk170. There are lots of rumors but little hard evidence on relabeled parts; while there seems to be a good case for power devices commonly being relabeled i don't see too much about small-signal devices. It would seem like the profit-per-unit would be low enough that it wouldn't be worth it for these, but who knows?
 
Nov 29, 2006 at 12:14 AM Post #131 of 158
FWIW, I ordered 25 of each (all BL class) from B&D some time back and was able to get 5 sets of reasonably good 4-way matches (this is for the β22 amp). Maybe I'm lucky...
 
Jan 5, 2007 at 5:14 PM Post #132 of 158
Hi
I am going to build KGSS or BH.
Must I match its transistors (not first FET) like gilmore dynamic too?
I read headwize so I know KG** must adjust offset with potentiometers.
It can not adjust If I did not match transistors?
confused.gif
 
Mar 30, 2007 at 1:17 AM Post #134 of 158
Quote:

Originally Posted by luvdunhill /img/forum/go_quote.gif
hi! would someone be so kind as to compare the method of matching BJTs recommended in this thread (using a variable resistor and two meters) versus grouping by collector voltage (the method is outlined here http://www.diamondstar.de/transistor...ing_bjt.html)?


They are essentially doing the same thing, except that in the "grouping by collector voltage" method, you don't actually know what the Hfe of each device is without doing some computation.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top